ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 426 — Integration of Department of Defense intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities

submitted 23 years ago by Pub. L. 108-136 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 802 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security must set up a council to align the Defense Department's intelligence and surveillance work. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the Under Secretary must also brief Congress each year on combatant commands' intelligence needs, gaps, and plans, through 2025.

(a) ISR Integration Council. (1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security must create an Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Integration Council. The Council exists to: help the Secretary of Defense carry out duties given to the Secretary under section 105(a) of the National Security Act of 1947; help the Under Secretary integrate intelligence and counterintelligence work across the military departments, Defense Department intelligence agencies, and relevant combatant commands, and coordinate how they develop new capabilities; and generally help make that integration and coordination happen.
(2) The Council's members are: the Under Secretary, who chairs it; the directors of the Defense Department's intelligence agencies; the top intelligence officers of the armed forces and the regional and functional combatant commands; the Joint Chiefs of Staff's Director for Intelligence; and the Joint Chiefs of Staff's Director for Operations.
(3) The Under Secretary must invite the Director of National Intelligence, or someone representing that Director, to take part in the Council's work.
(4) The Under Secretary may also invite other people to attend, whenever the Under Secretary thinks that is appropriate.

(b) Annual briefings on the intelligence needs of the combatant commands. (1) The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff must brief the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees each year on: (A) each relevant combatant command's intelligence and counterintelligence needs, broken down by the specific type of capability needed; (B) how well each command's validated needs were actually met the year before, by capability type — called the "fulfillment rate"; (C) a risk analysis of the critical gaps that would result if those needs go unmet; (D) a plan to close those gaps, covering space-based, air, ground, sea, and cyber intelligence capabilities; and (E) detailed numbers for the prior year — how many of each commander's requests were validated and how much capacity was actually delivered; how much of each capability type the Joint Chiefs asked each military department to provide, and how much each department actually provided; and a qualitative assessment of how well intelligence work lines up with the analysis programs of each military service's combat support agencies and intelligence centers, both within the Defense Intelligence Enterprise and within the wider intelligence community.
(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security must separately brief the same committees on short-, medium-, and long-term strategies for meeting the combatant commands' validated needs, again covering space-based, air, ground, sea, and cyber capabilities.
(3) Both briefings must be given at the same time the President submits the federal budget each year, for fiscal years 2021 through 2025.
(4) This subsection defines four terms: "congressional intelligence committees" means what section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 says it means; the "Defense Intelligence Enterprise" means the organizations, infrastructure, and policies of the intelligence, counterintelligence, and security parts of the Defense Department, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, the military departments, and other Defense Department units doing intelligence-related work; "fulfillment rate" means the percentage of a combatant command's intelligence needs that were actually met; and "intelligence community" means what section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 says it means.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)ISR Integration Council.—
(1)

The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security shall establish an Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Integration Council—

(A)

to assist the Secretary of Defense in carrying out the responsibilities of the Secretary under section 105(a) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3038(a));

(B)

to assist the Under Secretary with respect to matters relating to—

(i)

integration of intelligence and counterintelligence capabilities and activities under section 137(b) of this title of the military departments, intelligence agencies of the Department of Defense, and relevant combatant commands; and

(ii)

coordination of related developmental activities of such departments, agencies, and combatant commands; and

(C)

to otherwise provide a means to facilitate such integration and coordination.

(2)

The Council shall be composed of—

(A)

the Under Secretary, who shall chair the Council;

(B)

the directors of the intelligence agencies of the Department of Defense;

(C)

the senior intelligence officers of the armed forces and the regional and functional combatant commands;

(D)

the Director for Intelligence of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and

(E)

the Director for Operations of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

(3)

The Under Secretary shall invite the participation of the Director of National Intelligence (or a representative of the Director) in the proceedings of the Council.

(4)

The Under Secretary may designate additional participants to attend the proceedings of the Council, as the Under Secretary determines appropriate.

(b)Annual Briefings on the Intelligence and Counterintelligence Requirements of the Combatant Commands.—
(1)

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide to the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees a briefing on the following:

(A)

The intelligence and counterintelligence requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of each of the relevant combatant commands.

(B)

For the year preceding the year in which the briefing is provided, the fulfillment rate for each of the relevant combatant commands of the validated intelligence and counterintelligence requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of such combatant command.

(C)

A risk analysis identifying the critical gaps and shortfalls in efforts to address operational and strategic requirements of the Department of Defense that would result from the failure to fulfill the validated intelligence and counterintelligence requirements of the relevant combatant commands.

(D)

A mitigation plan to balance and offset the gaps and shortfalls identified under subparagraph (C), including with respect to spaceborne, airborne, ground, maritime, and cyber intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.

(E)

For the year preceding the year in which the briefing is provided—

(i)

the number of intelligence and counterintelligence requests of each commander of a relevant combatant command determined by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to be a validated requirement, and the total of capacity of such requests provided to each such commander;

(ii)

with respect to such validated requirements—

(I)

the quantity of intelligence and counterintelligence capabilities or activities, by specific intelligence capability type, that the Joint Chiefs of Staff requested each military department to provide; and

(II)

the total of capacity of such requests so provided by each such military department; and

(iii)

a qualitative assessment of the alignment of intelligence and counterintelligence capabilities and activities with the program of analysis for each combat support agency and intelligence center of a military service that is part of—

(I)

the Defense Intelligence Enterprise; and

(II)

the intelligence community.

(2)

The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security shall provide to the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees a briefing on short-, mid-, and long-term strategies to address the validated intelligence and counterintelligence requirements of the relevant combatant commands, including with respect to spaceborne, airborne, ground, maritime, and cyber intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.

(3)

The briefings required by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be provided at the same time that the President’s budget is submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025.

(4)

In this subsection:

(A)

The term “congressional intelligence committees” has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).

(B)

The term “Defense Intelligence Enterprise” means the organizations, infrastructure, and measures, including policies, processes, procedures, and products, of the intelligence, counterintelligence, and security components of each of the following:

(i)

The Department of Defense.

(ii)

The Joint Staff.

(iii)

The combatant commands.

(iv)

The military departments.

(v)

Other elements of the Department of Defense that perform national intelligence, defense intelligence, intelligence-related, counterintelligence, or security functions.

(C)

The term “fulfillment rate” means the percentage of combatant command intelligence and counterintelligence requirements satisfied by available, acquired, or realigned intelligence and counterintelligence capabilities or activities.

(D)

The term “intelligence community” has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IX, § 923(c)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1575; amended Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(3), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2398; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IX, § 931(a)(7), (8), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 285; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title IX, § 922(b), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4331; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVI, § 1625(b), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2121; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVI, §§ 1621(e)(1)(A)(vii), 1622, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1733.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2003Enacted · Pub. L. 108-136 · 117 Stat. 1575
  • 2006Amended · Pub. L. 109-364 · 120 Stat. 2398
  • 2008Amended · Pub. L. 110-181 · 122 Stat. 285
  • 2011Amended · Pub. L. 111-383 · 124 Stat. 4331
  • 2018Amended · Pub. L. 115-232 · 132 Stat. 2121
  • 2019Amended · Pub. L. 116-92 · 133 Stat. 1733

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-136 on 2003-11-24.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case