ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 457Operational files previously maintained by or concerning activities of National Photographic Interpretation Center: authority to withhold from public disclosure

submitted 27 years ago by Pub. L. 106-65 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 135 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Authority.—

The Secretary of Defense may withhold from public disclosure operational files described in subsection (b) to the same extent that operational files may be withheld under section 701 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3141).

(b)Covered Operational Files.—

The authority under subsection (a) applies to operational files in the possession of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency that—

(1)

as of September 22, 1996, were maintained by the National Photographic Interpretation Center; or

(2)

concern the activities of the Agency that, as of such date, were performed by the National Photographic Interpretation Center.

(c)Operational Files Defined.—

In this section, the term “operational files” has the meaning given that term in section 701(b) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3141(b)).

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, § 1045(a), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 762; amended Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IX, § 921(d)(2)(A), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1568; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(c)(8), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3509.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1999Enacted · Pub. L. 106-65 · 113 Stat. 762
  • 2003Amended · Pub. L. 108-136 · 117 Stat. 1568
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-291 · 128 Stat. 3509

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-65 on 1999-10-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case