ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 496 — Consideration of expansion of nuclear forces of other countries

submitted 13 years ago by Pub. L. 112-239 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 279 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

At least 60 days before recommending reductions in United States nuclear forces, the President must provide intelligence assessments about other nuclear-armed countries and the effects of the reductions. The Strategic Command commander must certify whether the reductions would harm flexibility, deterrence, or assurance.

(a) Report and Certification. At least 60 days before recommending any reduction in United States nuclear forces—

(1) the President must send the appropriate congressional committees a report for each nuclear-armed country. The report must give the intelligence community’s high-, medium-, and low-confidence assessments about—

(A) the number of each type of nuclear weapon that country possesses;

(B) that country’s modernization plans for those weapons;

(C) that country’s capacity to produce nuclear warheads and strategic delivery systems;

(D) that country’s nuclear doctrine; and

(E) how the recommended reductions would affect United States deterrence and extended-deterrence capabilities; and

(2) the Commander of the United States Strategic Command must certify to those committees whether the reductions would—

(A) impair the United States’ ability to address an unplanned strategic or geopolitical event or a technical challenge; or

(B) weaken the deterrence or assurance the United States provides to its friends and allies.

(b) Form. The reports required by subsection (a)(1) must be unclassified, but may include a classified annex.

(c) Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined. “Appropriate congressional committees” means—

(1) the congressional defense committees; and

(2) the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. The section does not define the quoted term “intelligence community”; it instead refers to the definition in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Report and Certification.—

Not later than 60 days before the President recommends any reductions to the nuclear forces of the United States—

(1)

the President shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a report detailing, for each country with nuclear weapons, the high-, medium-, and low- confidence assessment of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))) with respect to—

(A)

the number of each type of nuclear weapons possessed by such country;

(B)

the modernization plans for such weapons of such country;

(C)

the production capacity of nuclear warheads and strategic delivery systems (as defined in section 495(e)(2) of this title) of such country;

(D)

the nuclear doctrine of such country; and

(E)

the impact of such recommended reductions on the deterrence and extended deterrence capabilities of the United States; and

(2)

the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall certify to the appropriate congressional committees whether such recommended reductions in the nuclear forces of the United States will—

(A)

impair the ability of the United States to address—

(i)

unplanned strategic or geopolitical events; or

(ii)

technical challenge; or

(B)

degrade the deterrence or assurance provided by the United States to friends and allies of the United States.

(b)Form.—

The reports required by subsection (a)(1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(c)Appropriate Congressional Committees Defined.—

In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:

(1)

The congressional defense committees.

(2)

The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1036(a), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1924; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(c)(10), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3509.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2013Enacted · Pub. L. 112-239 · 126 Stat. 1924
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-291 · 128 Stat. 3509

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 112-239 on 2013-01-02.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case