10 U.S.C. § 7838 — Settlement of accounts: affidavit of company commander
submitted 70 years ago by ch. 1041 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 107 words · no verdicts yet
In settling a company commander’s accounts for clothing and military supplies, the commander’s affidavit may prove lost records, unavoidable or faultless losses, or proper use of supplies. The Secretary of the Army decides how the affidavit may be used as evidence.
In the settlement of the accounts of the commanding officer* of a company for clothing and other military supplies*, his affidavit may be received to show— (1) that vouchers or company books were lost; (2) anything tending to prove that any apparent deficiency of those articles was caused by unavoidable accident, or by loss in actual service without his fault; or (3) that all or part of the clothing and supplies was properly used. The affidavit may be used as evidence of the facts set forth, with or without other evidence, as determined by the Secretary of the Army* to be just and proper under the circumstances.
In the settlement of the accounts of the commanding officer* of a company for clothing and other military supplies*, his affidavit may be received to show—
that vouchers or company books were lost;
anything tending to prove that any apparent deficiency of those articles was caused by unavoidable accident, or by loss in actual service without his fault; or
that all or part of the clothing and supplies was properly used.
The affidavit may be used as evidence of the facts set forth, with or without other evidence, as determined by the Secretary of the Army* to be just and proper under the circumstances.
Source credit: (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 274, § 4838; renumbered § 7838, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 808(d), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)
- 1956Enacted · Act of Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041
- 2018Amended · Pub. L. 115-232 · 132 Stat. 1839
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 1041 on 1956-08-10.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case