ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 867Art. 67. Review by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

submitted 70 years ago by ch. 1041 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 650 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section requires the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces to review specified court-martial records and limits what it may review.

(a) The Court must review the record in (1) every case where a Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a death sentence; (2) every case reviewed by a Court of Criminal Appeals that the Judge Advocate General orders sent to it after the required notifications; and (3) every such case in which, for good cause shown, it grants the accused’s petition. (b) The accused may petition within 60 days after the earlier of notice of the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision or the date a copy of that decision, after being served on the accused’s appellate counsel of record, if any, is deposited for delivery by first-class certified mail to the accused’s provided address, or the latest address in the official service record if none was provided. The Court must act promptly under its rules. (c) In a reviewed case, the Court may act only on the judgment’s findings and sentence, or a military judge’s decision, judgment, or order, as the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed or set aside as legally incorrect, and on findings that court affirmed, dismissed, set aside, or modified as factually incorrect under article 66(d)(1)(B). If the Judge Advocate General sent the case, the Court need address only the issues raised by him. On an accused’s petition, it need address only the issues in the grant of review. The Court may act only on legal matters. (d) If the Court sets aside the findings and sentence, it may order a rehearing unless the set-aside is based on insufficient record evidence. If it sets them aside without ordering a rehearing, it must order the charges dismissed. (e) After acting, the Court may direct the Judge Advocate General to return the record to the Court of Criminal Appeals for further review consistent with its decision. Otherwise, unless the President or Secretary concerned will act further, the Judge Advocate General must instruct the convening authority to follow the decision. If a rehearing was ordered but the convening authority finds it impracticable, that authority may dismiss the charges. If a special trial counsel referred the case, a special trial counsel must decide whether rehearing is impracticable and dismiss if so.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces shall review the record in—

(1)

all cases in which the sentence, as affirmed by a Court of Criminal Appeals, extends to death;

(2)

all cases reviewed by a Court of Criminal Appeals which the Judge Advocate General, after appropriate notification to the other Judge Advocates General and the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, orders sent to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for review; and

(3)

all cases reviewed by a Court of Criminal Appeals in which, upon petition of the accused and on good cause shown, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has granted a review.

(b)

The accused may petition the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for review of a decision of a Court of Criminal Appeals within 60 days from the earlier of—

(1)

the date on which the accused is notified of the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals; or

(2)

the date on which a copy of the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals, after being served on appellate counsel of record for the accused (if any), is deposited in the United States mails for delivery by first-class certified mail to the accused at an address provided by the accused or, if no such address has been provided by the accused, at the latest address listed for the accused in his official service record.

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces shall act upon such a petition promptly in accordance with the rules of the court.

(c)
(1)

In any case reviewed by it, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces may act only with respect to—

(A)

the findings and sentence set forth in the entry of judgment, as affirmed or set aside as incorrect in law by the Court of Criminal Appeals;

(B)

a decision, judgment, or order by a military judge, as affirmed or set aside as incorrect in law by the Court of Criminal Appeals; or

(C)

the findings set forth in the entry of judgment, as affirmed, dismissed, set aside, or modfied by the Court of Criminal Appeals as incorrect in fact under section 866(d)(1)(B) of this title (article 66(d)(1)(B)).

(2)

In a case which the Judge Advocate General orders sent to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, that action need be taken only with respect to the issues raised by him.

(3)

In a case reviewed upon petition of the accused, that action need be taken only with respect to issues specified in the grant of review.

(4)

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces shall take action only with respect to matters of law.

(d)

If the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces sets aside the findings and sentence, it may, except where the setting aside is based on lack of sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings, order a rehearing. If it sets aside the findings and sentence and does not order a rehearing, it shall order that the charges be dismissed.

(e)

After it has acted on a case, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces may direct the Judge Advocate General to return the record to the Court of Criminal Appeals for further review in accordance with the decision of the court. Otherwise, unless there is to be further action by the President or the Secretary concerned, the Judge Advocate General shall instruct the convening authority to take action in accordance with that decision. If the court has ordered a rehearing, but the convening authority finds a rehearing impracticable, he may dismiss the charges. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if a case was referred to trial by a special trial counsel, a special trial counsel shall determine if a rehearing is impracticable and shall dismiss the charges if the special trial counsel so determines.

Source credit: (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 60; Pub. L. 88–426, title IV, § 403(j), Aug. 14, 1964, 78 Stat. 434; Pub. L. 90–340, § 1, June 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 178; Pub. L. 90–632, § 2(28), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1342; Pub. L. 96–579, § 12(a), Dec. 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 3369; Pub. L. 97–81, § 5, Nov. 20, 1981, 95 Stat. 1088; Pub. L. 97–295, § 1(12), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1289; Pub. L. 98–209, §§ 7(d), 9(a), 10(c)(2), 13(d), Dec. 6, 1983, 97 Stat. 1402, 1404, 1406, 1408; Pub. L. 100–26, § 7(a)(2), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 275; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title VII, § 722(a), (c), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2002, 2003; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XIII, § 1301(a), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1569; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, § 924(c)(1), (2), (4)(B), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2831, 2832; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LIX, § 5331, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2934; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title V, § 542(c), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3612; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, § 539A(c), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1699.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1956Enacted · Act of Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041
  • 1964Amended · Pub. L. 88-426 · 78 Stat. 434
  • 1968Amended · Pub. L. 90-340 · 82 Stat. 178
  • 1968Amended · Pub. L. 90-632 · 82 Stat. 1342
  • 1980Amended · Pub. L. 96-579 · 94 Stat. 3369
  • 1981Amended · Pub. L. 97-81 · 95 Stat. 1088
  • 1982Amended · Pub. L. 97-295 · 96 Stat. 1289
  • 1983Amended · Pub. L. 98-209 · 97 Stat. 1402, 1404, 1406, 1408
  • 1987Amended · Pub. L. 100-26 · 101 Stat. 275
  • 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-456 · 102 Stat. 2002, 2003
  • 1989Amended · Pub. L. 101-189 · 103 Stat. 1569
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-337 · 108 Stat. 2831, 2832
  • 2016Amended · Pub. L. 114-328 · 130 Stat. 2934
  • 2021Amended · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 3612
  • 2021Amended · Pub. L. 117-81 · 135 Stat. 1699

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 1041 on 1956-08-10.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case