ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

12 U.S.C. § 3309 — Risk management training

submitted 37 years ago by Pub. L. 95-630 to r/title-12-BANKS-AND-BANKING · 85 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Council must provide risk-management seminars for its employees and insured financial institutions’ employees. It also had to study and report on a formal certification-focused risk-management training program.

(a) Seminars The Council must develop and administer training seminars in risk management for its employees and the employees of insured financial institutions.
(b) Study of risk management training program Not later than end of the 1-year period beginning on August 9, 1989 , the Council must—
(1) conduct a study on the feasibility and appropriateness of establishing a formalized risk management training program designed to lead to the certification of Risk Management Analysts; and
(2) report to the Congress the results of such study.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Seminars

The Council shall develop and administer training seminars in risk management for its employees and the employees of insured financial institutions.

(b) Study of risk management training program

Not later than end of the 1-year period beginning on August 9, 1989, the Council shall—

(1)

conduct a study on the feasibility and appropriateness of establishing a formalized risk management training program designed to lead to the certification of Risk Management Analysts; and

(2)

report to the Congress the results of such study.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 95–630, title X, § 1009A, as added Pub. L. 101–73, title XII, § 1218, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 546.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1989Enacted · Pub. L. 95-630 · 103 Stat. 546

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-630 on 1989-08-09.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case