ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

15 U.S.C. § 7701Congressional findings and policy

submitted 23 years ago by Pub. L. 108-187 to r/title-15-COMMERCE-AND-TRADE · 642 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress found that spam email has grown out of control and often deceives recipients. Spam costs people time and money, and conflicting state laws make it hard to regulate. So Congress set one national rule requiring honest email and letting recipients opt out.

(a) Findings — Congress finds the following twelve things. (1) Email has become an extremely important and popular way to communicate. Millions of Americans rely on it every day for personal and business use. It is cheap and reaches the whole world, which makes it very convenient and efficient, and creates unique chances for easy, low-friction business to grow. (2) Email's convenience and efficiency are under threat because unwanted commercial email is growing extremely fast. Unwanted commercial email is now estimated to make up over half of all email traffic, up from about 7 percent in 2001, and the amount keeps rising. Most of these messages are fraudulent or deceptive in some way. (3) People who receive unwanted commercial email cannot refuse to get it. They pay costs — for storing it, or for the time spent opening, checking, and deleting it, or both. (4) Getting a large number of unwanted messages also makes email less convenient. It creates a risk that wanted messages — both business and personal — get lost, missed, or thrown out along with the unwanted ones. That makes email less reliable and useful for the person receiving it. (5) Some commercial email contains content that many people would consider vulgar or pornographic. (6) The growth of unwanted commercial email costs real money for internet providers, businesses, and schools and nonprofits that carry and receive it, since there is a limit to how much mail they can handle without spending more on infrastructure. (7) Many senders of unwanted commercial email deliberately hide where the mail is really coming from. (8) Many senders of unwanted commercial email deliberately write misleading subject lines to trick people into opening the message. (9) Some senders give recipients a simple, reliable way to "opt out" of getting more commercial email from them in the future. Other senders give no such opt-out method, or refuse to honor opt-out requests, or both. (10) Many senders of bulk unwanted commercial email use computer programs to automatically collect large numbers of email addresses from websites or online services where people must post their address to fully use the site or service. (11) Many states have passed laws to regulate or reduce unwanted commercial email, but these laws set different standards and requirements. As a result, they have not solved the problem, partly because an email address does not show a geographic location, making it hard for law-abiding businesses to know which of these different state laws they must follow. (12) The problems caused by the rapid growth and abuse of unwanted commercial email cannot be solved by federal law alone. New technology and cooperation with other countries will also be needed. (b) Congressional determination of public policy — Based on the findings in subsection (a), Congress determines the following three things. (1) There is a substantial government interest in regulating commercial email on a nationwide basis. (2) Senders of commercial email should not mislead recipients about where the mail comes from or what it contains. (3) People who receive commercial email have the right to refuse to get more commercial email from the same sender.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Findings

The Congress finds the following:

(1)

Electronic mail has become an extremely important and popular means of communication, relied on by millions of Americans on a daily basis for personal and commercial purposes. Its low cost and global reach make it extremely convenient and efficient, and offer unique opportunities for the development and growth of frictionless commerce.

(2)

The convenience and efficiency of electronic mail are threatened by the extremely rapid growth in the volume of unsolicited commercial electronic mail. Unsolicited commercial electronic mail is currently estimated to account for over half of all electronic mail traffic, up from an estimated 7 percent in 2001, and the volume continues to rise. Most of these messages are fraudulent or deceptive in one or more respects.

(3)

The receipt of unsolicited commercial electronic mail may result in costs to recipients who cannot refuse to accept such mail and who incur costs for the storage of such mail, or for the time spent accessing, reviewing, and discarding such mail, or for both.

(4)

The receipt of a large number of unwanted messages also decreases the convenience of electronic mail and creates a risk that wanted electronic mail messages, both commercial and noncommercial, will be lost, overlooked, or discarded amidst the larger volume of unwanted messages, thus reducing the reliability and usefulness of electronic mail to the recipient.

(5)

Some commercial electronic mail contains material that many recipients may consider vulgar or pornographic in nature.

(6)

The growth in unsolicited commercial electronic mail imposes significant monetary costs on providers of Internet access services, businesses, and educational and nonprofit institutions that carry and receive such mail, as there is a finite volume of mail that such providers, businesses, and institutions can handle without further investment in infrastructure.

(7)

Many senders of unsolicited commercial electronic mail purposefully disguise the source of such mail.

(8)

Many senders of unsolicited commercial electronic mail purposefully include misleading information in the messages’ subject lines in order to induce the recipients to view the messages.

(9)

While some senders of commercial electronic mail messages provide simple and reliable ways for recipients to reject (or “opt-out” of) receipt of commercial electronic mail from such senders in the future, other senders provide no such “opt-out” mechanism, or refuse to honor the requests of recipients not to receive electronic mail from such senders in the future, or both.

(10)

Many senders of bulk unsolicited commercial electronic mail use computer programs to gather large numbers of electronic mail addresses on an automated basis from Internet websites or online services where users must post their addresses in order to make full use of the website or service.

(11)

Many States have enacted legislation intended to regulate or reduce unsolicited commercial electronic mail, but these statutes impose different standards and requirements. As a result, they do not appear to have been successful in addressing the problems associated with unsolicited commercial electronic mail, in part because, since an electronic mail address does not specify a geographic location, it can be extremely difficult for law-abiding businesses to know with which of these disparate statutes they are required to comply.

(12)

The problems associated with the rapid growth and abuse of unsolicited commercial electronic mail cannot be solved by Federal legislation alone. The development and adoption of technological approaches and the pursuit of cooperative efforts with other countries will be necessary as well.

(b) Congressional determination of public policy

On the basis of the findings in subsection (a), the Congress determines that—

(1)

there is a substantial government interest in regulation of commercial electronic mail on a nationwide basis;

(2)

senders of commercial electronic mail should not mislead recipients as to the source or content of such mail; and

(3)

recipients of commercial electronic mail have a right to decline to receive additional commercial electronic mail from the same source.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 108–187, § 2, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2699.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2003Enacted · Pub. L. 108-187 · 117 Stat. 2699

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-187 on 2003-12-16.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case