ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 410z–1Acquisition of additional sites

submitted 52 years ago by Pub. L. 93-431 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 460 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of the Interior must study four more Boston sites — Boston Common, the Dillaway-Thomas House, the Old Corner Book Store, and several burying grounds — to see if they should join the Boston National Historical Park, though only Congress can actually add them. The Secretary can also sign preservation agreements with the city, state, or private groups, and identify other significant historic sites nearby.

(a) Studies: Besides the properties named in section 410z of this title, the Secretary must study these properties to see if they're feasible and suitable to add to Boston National Historical Park: (1) Boston Common; (2) the Dillaway-Thomas House; (3) the Thomas Crease House, also known as the Old Corner Book Store; and (4) the King's Chapel, Granary, and Copp's Hill burying grounds. While studying them, the Secretary may make tentative agreements with owners for including their property, and take options, for a small payment, to buy them — but no new property can actually be added to the park except by an act of Congress. (b) Cooperative agreements: (1) To further the purposes of section 410z of this title, the Secretary may sign cooperative agreements with the city of Boston, Massachusetts, or private organizations, to mark, interpret, restore, or give technical help preserving and interpreting the properties named in section 410z, or parts of them, when the Secretary thinks private, city, or state ownership works best, alongside the Boston National Historical Park. These agreements must let the Secretary, through the National Park Service, reach public parts of the property at all reasonable times, for tours and public interpretation, and must require mutual agreement before making changes to the property — except that no agreement may limit or control how a property customarily used for church purposes is used. The agreements may spell out in detail how much the Secretary will help restore, preserve, and maintain the property. (2) The Secretary may also agree with the Boston Public Library to distribute information about the park and the Freedom Trail. (c) Identification and marking: The Secretary may identify other significant colonial and Revolutionary-era historic sites in and around Boston connected to this park, and, with the owner's consent, may appropriately mark them and mention them in interpretive materials.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Studies

In addition to the properties described in section 410z of this title, the Secretary shall study the properties described in this section to determine the feasibility and suitability of including them within the Boston National Historical Park. In making such studies, he may enter into tentative agreements with any owners thereof for their inclusion in said park and he may enter into options, for a nominal consideration, for the purchase of such properties, but no additional properties may be added to the park except by an act of the Congress. Studies shall be made of the following properties:

(1)

Boston Common;

(2)

Dillaway-Thomas House;

(3)

Thomas Crease House (old Corner Book Store); and

(4)

the following burying grounds: King’s Chapel, Granary, and Copp’s Hill.

(b) Cooperative agreements authorized
(1)

In furtherance of the general purposes of this subchapter as prescribed in section 410z of this title, the Secretary is authorized to enter into cooperative agreements with the city of Boston, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any private organization to mark, interpret, restore, and/or provide technical assistance for the preservation and interpretation of any properties listed in section 410z of this title, or portions thereof, which, in his opinion, would best be preserved in private, municipal, or State ownership, in connection with the Boston National Historical Park. Such agreements shall contain, but shall not be limited to, provisions that the Secretary, through the National Park Service, shall have right of access at all reasonable times to all public portions of the property covered by such agreement for the purpose of conducting visitors through such properties and interpreting them to the public, that no changes or alterations shall be made in such properties except by mutual agreement between the Secretary and the other parties to such agreements, except that no limitation or control of any kind over the use of any such properties customarily used for church purposes shall be imposed by any agreement. The agreements may contain specific provisions which outline in detail the extent of the participation by the Secretary in the restoration, preservation, and maintenance of such historic properties.

(2)

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Boston Public Library to provide for the distribution of informational and interpretive materials relating to the park and to the Freedom Trail.

(c) Identification and marking of significant historical sites

The Secretary may identify other significant sites of the colonial and Revolutionary periods of American history in the city of Boston, Massachusetts, and its environs, which are related to the historical park created by this subchapter, and, with the consent of the owner or owners thereof, may mark them appropriately and make reference to them in any interpretive literature.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 93–431, § 3, Oct. 1, 1974, 88 Stat. 1185; Pub. L. 95–625, title III, § 310(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3478; Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title V, § 504, Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4155.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1974Enacted · Pub. L. 93-431 · 88 Stat. 1185
  • 1978Amended · Pub. L. 95-625 · 92 Stat. 3478
  • 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-333 · 110 Stat. 4155

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 93-431 on 1974-10-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case