ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 4202 — Findings

submitted 38 years ago by Pub. L. 100-478 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 328 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section states Congress’s findings about the decline of African elephant populations and the illegal ivory trade. It describes the relationship between African and Asian elephant conservation, the CITES Ivory Control System, conservation resources, United States responsibility, and sport hunting.

Congress finds: (1) African elephant populations have declined at an alarming rate since the mid-1970s. (2) The large illegal trade in African elephant ivory is the main cause of the decline and threatens the African elephant’s continued existence. (3) The African elephant is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and its continued existence will be put in greater danger if the decline is not reversed. (4) African and Asian elephant ivory cannot be distinguished from each other. Therefore, trade in African elephant ivory must not further endanger the Asian elephant, which is listed as endangered under section 4 of that Act and under Appendix I of CITES. (5) In response to the significant illegal trade in African elephant ivory, the parties to CITES created the CITES Ivory Control System to reduce that illegal trade and encourage African countries to manage, conserve, and protect their African elephant populations. (6) The CITES Ivory Control System recently took effect and should remain in effect for a reasonable period so its effectiveness in reducing the illegal trade can be assessed. This section does not define the quoted terms “reasonable period” or “effectiveness.” (7) Some African countries have effective elephant-conservation programs, but many lack enough resources to properly manage, conserve, and protect their elephant populations. (8) The United States, as a CITES party and a large market for worked ivory, shares responsibility for supporting and carrying out measures to stop the illegal trade in African elephant ivory and conserve the African elephant. (9) There is no evidence that sport hunting is part of the poaching contributing to the illegal African elephant ivory trade. There is evidence that properly using well-managed elephant populations provides an important source of funding for African elephant conservation programs. This section does not define the quoted terms “worked ivory,” “sport hunting,” or “proper utilization.”

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The Congress finds the following:

(1)

Elephant populations in Africa have declined at an alarming rate since the mid-1970’s.

(2)

The large illegal trade in African elephant ivory is the major cause of this decline and threatens the continued existence of the African elephant.

(3)

The African elephant is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and its continued existence will be further jeopardized if this decline is not reversed.

(4)

Because African elephant ivory is indistinguishable from Asian elephant ivory, there is a need to ensure that the trade in African elephant ivory does not further endanger the Asian elephant, which is listed as endangered under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533) and under Appendix I of CITES.

(5)

In response to the significant illegal trade in African elephant ivory, the parties to CITES established the CITES Ivory Control System to curtail the illegal trade and to encourage African countries to manage, conserve, and protect their African elephant populations.

(6)

The CITES Ivory Control System entered into force recently and should be allowed to continue in force for a reasonable period of time to assess its effectiveness in curtailing the illegal trade in African elephant ivory.

(7)

Although some African countries have effective African elephant conservation programs, many do not have sufficient resources to properly manage, conserve, and protect their elephant populations.

(8)

The United States, as a party to CITES and a large market for worked ivory, shares responsibility for supporting and implementing measures to stop the illegal trade in African elephant ivory and to provide for the conservation of the African elephant.

(9)

There is no evidence that sport hunting is part of the poaching that contributes to the illegal trade in African elephant ivory, and there is evidence that the proper utilization of well-managed elephant populations provides an important source of funding for African elephant conservation programs.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 100–478, title II, § 2003, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2315.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1988Enacted · Pub. L. 100-478 · 102 Stat. 2315

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 100-478 on 1988-10-07.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case