16 U.S.C. § 460lll–44 — Records
submitted 28 years ago by Pub. L. 105-277 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 109 words · no verdicts yet
The Secretary gets access to all Tennessee Valley Authority records about managing this area. Relevant personnel records must be shared too, on request. The Authority can protect private or proprietary information and must hand over land title and survey records.
(a) Recreation Area* records - The Secretary* may access all Tennessee Valley Authority records about managing the Recreation Area.
(b) Personnel records - The Tennessee Valley Authority must make its personnel records available to the Secretary on request, as far as they matter to Forest Service administration.
(c) Confidentiality - The Tennessee Valley Authority may set terms to protect private or proprietary information in the records it shares.
(d) Land title records - The Tennessee Valley Authority must give the Secretary its original records on land titles, surveys, and other records about the transferred personal property and facilities.
The Secretary* shall have access to all records of the Tennessee Valley Authority pertaining to the management of the Recreation Area.
The Tennessee Valley Authority personnel records shall be made available to the Secretary, on request, to the extent the records are relevant to Forest Service administration.
The Tennessee Valley Authority may prescribe terms and conditions on the availability of records to protect the confidentiality of private or proprietary information.
The Tennessee Valley Authority shall provide to the Secretary original records pertaining to land titles, surveys, and other records pertaining to transferred personal property and facilities.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, § 101(e) [title V, § 544], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–318.)
- 1998Enacted · Pub. L. 105-277 · 112 Stat. 2681
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 105-277 on 1998-10-21.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case