16 U.S.C. § 460n–7 — Revenues and fees; disposition
submitted 62 years ago by Pub. L. 88-639 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 115 words · no verdicts yet
Money the government collects at Lake Mead is handled the same way as revenue from regular national parks. But if the Secretary decides certain revenue, including from mineral development, comes from Indian land, that money goes to the Indian landowner instead. Other mineral and public-land revenue follows its own separate laws.
Revenues and fees obtained by the United States from operation of the national recreation area shall be subject to the same statutory provisions concerning the disposition thereof as are similar revenues collected in areas of the national park system with the exception, that those particular revenues and fees including those from mineral developments, which the Secretary of the Interior finds are reasonably attributable to Indian lands shall be paid to the Indian owner of the land, and with the further exception that other fees and revenues obtained from mineral development and from activities under other public land laws within the recreation area shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 88–639, § 8, Oct. 8, 1964, 78 Stat. 1041.)
- 1964Enacted · Pub. L. 88-639 · 78 Stat. 1041
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 88-639 on 1964-10-08.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case