ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 460nnn–71Designation of streams for wild and scenic river status in Steens Mountain Area

submitted 26 years ago by Pub. L. 106-399 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 45 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Parts (a) and (b) of this section just amended other laws to add river segments; that text isn't reproduced here. Part (c) says that when Wilderness Area rules and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act rules conflict for these streams, the stricter rule wins.

(a) and (b): The statutory text notes these subsections as "Omitted" — they aren't reproduced here because they simply amended other parts of the U.S. Code to designate certain streams as wild and scenic rivers, rather than stating an independent rule. (c) Management. For any stream segment this section added, if the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and the rules for the Wilderness Area would require different levels of protection, whichever rule is more restrictive is the one that applies.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a), (b) Omitted

(c) Management

Where management requirements for a stream segment described in the amendments made by this section differ between the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.) and the Wilderness Area, the more restrictive requirements shall apply.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 106–399, title III, § 301, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1667.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2000Enacted · Pub. L. 106-399 · 114 Stat. 1667

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-399 on 2000-10-30.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case