ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 460z–3Boundary map; revision

submitted 54 years ago by Pub. L. 92-260 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 110 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The recreation area's boundaries, including the inland sector, are set on a 1971 official map. That map includes a detailed written boundary description, and is available for public viewing. The Secretary may fix typos in it through the Federal Register.

The recreation area's boundaries, including the inland sector's boundaries inside it, are shown on a map called "Proposed Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area," dated May 1971. The map is on file for public viewing at the Forest Service's main office, and it comes with a detailed written description of the boundaries by metes and bounds. The Secretary may fix clerical or typing errors in the map or description by publishing a corrected version in the Federal Register.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The boundaries of the recreation area, as well as the boundaries of the inland sector included therein, shall be as shown on a map entitled “Proposed Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area” dated May 1971, which is on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Chief, Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, and to which is attached and hereby made a part thereof a detailed description by metes and bounds of the exterior boundaries of the recreation area and of the inland sector. The Secretary may by publication of a revised map or description in the Federal Register correct clerical or typographical errors in said map or descriptions.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 92–260, § 4, Mar. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 99.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1972Enacted · Pub. L. 92-260 · 86 Stat. 99

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 92-260 on 1972-03-23.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case