ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 8033Reports

submitted 7 years ago by Pub. L. 116-92 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 516 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Working Group must report to Congress on illegal fishing trends. This happens 5 years after the strategic plan, then every 5 years after that. The report covers threats, enforcement, and countries' progress.

Five years after the Working Group submits the 5-year strategic plan under section 8032 of this title, and every 5 years after that, the Working Group must send a report to several congressional committees — the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee; Senate Foreign Relations Committee; Senate Appropriations Committee; Senate Judiciary Committee; Senate Select Committee on Intelligence; Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee; House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee; House Natural Resources Committee; House Foreign Affairs Committee; and House Appropriations Committee. The report must include: (1) A summary of global and regional trends in illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. (2) An assessment of how much IUU fishing overlaps with organized crime, including human trafficking and forced labor. (3) An assessment of what topics, data sources, and strategies would benefit from more information sharing, plus recommendations for making data collection and sharing more consistent. (4) An assessment of assets — including military assets and intelligence — that could be used for enforcement or strategies against IUU fishing. (5) Summaries of the threats from IUU fishing in priority regions, and an assessment of those regions' capacity to respond. (6) An assessment of the progress priority-region countries have made responding to those threats because of U.S. assistance under the strategic plan, including: (A) identifying, for each country, the supply routes, ports of call, methods used to bring illegal catch into legal supply chains, and financial institutions used by people involved in IUU fishing, plus signs that link IUU fishing to money laundering; (B) an assessment of how much these countries have adopted or moved toward international treaties like the Port State Measures Agreement; (C) an assessment of how well these countries can trace seafood to verify it's legal and strengthen fisheries management; (D) an assessment of these countries' capacity to carry out shiprider agreements; (E) an assessment of their capacity to build awareness of activity in their waters; and (F) an assessment of whether these countries' governments can sustain the programs the U.S. has funded. (7) An assessment of priority flag states' capacity to track and police their fishing fleets, stop their vessels from IUU fishing, and enforce their own laws. (8) An assessment of how much groups designated as foreign terrorist organizations under section 1189 of title 8 are involved in IUU fishing. (9) The status of work with global enforcement partners.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Not later than 5 years after the submission of the 5-year integrated strategic plan under section 8032 of this title, and 5 years after, the Working Group shall submit a report to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives that contains—

(1)

a summary of global and regional trends in IUU fishing;

(2)

an assessment of the extent of the convergence between transnational organized illegal activity, including human trafficking and forced labor, and IUU fishing;

(3)

an assessment of the topics, data sources, and strategies that would benefit from increased information sharing and recommendations regarding harmonization of data collection and sharing;

(4)

an assessment of assets, including military assets and intelligence, which can be used for either enforcement operations or strategies to combat IUU fishing;

(5)

summaries of the situational threats with respect to IUU fishing in priority regions and an assessment of the capacity of countries within such regions to respond to those threats;

(6)

an assessment of the progress of countries in priority regions in responding to those threats as a result of assistance by the United States pursuant to the strategic plan developed under section 8032 of this title, including—

(A)

the identification of—

(i)

relevant supply routes, ports of call, methods of landing and entering illegally caught product into legal supply chains, and financial institutions used in each country by participants engaging in IUU fishing; and

(ii)

indicators of IUU fishing that are related to money laundering;

(B)

an assessment of the adherence to, or progress toward adoption of, international treaties related to IUU fishing, including the Port State Measures Agreement, by countries in priority regions;

(C)

an assessment of the implementation by countries in priority regions of seafood traceability or capacity to apply traceability to verify the legality of catch and strengthen fisheries management;

(D)

an assessment of the capacity of countries in priority regions to implement shiprider agreements;

(E)

an assessment of the capacity of countries in priority regions to increase maritime domain awareness; and

(F)

an assessment of the capacity of governments of relevant countries in priority regions to sustain the programs for which the United States has provided assistance under this chapter;

(7)

an assessment of the capacity of priority flag states to track the movement of and police their fleet, prevent their flagged vessels from engaging in IUU fishing, and enforce applicable laws and regulations;

(8)

an assessment of the extent of involvement in IUU fishing of organizations designated as foreign terrorist organizations under section 1189 of title 8; and

(9)

the status of work with global enforcement partners.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, § 3553, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2007; Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXIII, § 11339(c), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4105.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2019Enacted · Pub. L. 116-92 · 133 Stat. 2007
  • 2022Amended · Pub. L. 117-263 · 136 Stat. 4105

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 116-92 on 2019-12-20.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case