ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

18 U.S.C. § 3297 — Cases involving DNA evidence

submitted 22 years ago by Pub. L. 108-405 to r/title-18-CRIMES-AND-CRIMINAL-PROCEDURE · 58 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

In a case in which DNA testing implicates an identified person in the commission of a felony, no statute of limitations that would otherwise preclude prosecution of the offense must preclude such prosecution until a. It also states the related conditions, exceptions, definitions, or procedures in the section.

In a case in which DNA testing implicates an identified person in the commission of a felony, no statute of limitations that would otherwise preclude prosecution of the offense must preclude such prosecution until a period of time following the implication of the person by DNA testing has elapsed that is equal to the otherwise applicable limitation period.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

In a case in which DNA testing implicates an identified person in the commission of a felony, no statute of limitations that would otherwise preclude prosecution of the offense shall preclude such prosecution until a period of time following the implication of the person by DNA testing has elapsed that is equal to the otherwise applicable limitation period.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 108–405, title II, § 204(a), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2271; amended Pub. L. 109–162, title X, § 1005, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3086.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2004Enacted · Pub. L. 108-405 · 118 Stat. 2271
  • 2006Amended · Pub. L. 109-162 · 119 Stat. 3086

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-405 on 2004-10-30.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case