18 U.S.C. § 443 — War contracts
submitted 78 years ago by ch. 645 to r/title-18-CRIMES-AND-CRIMINAL-PROCEDURE · 190 words · no verdicts yet
This law makes it a crime to destroy certain war contract records too soon. It applies to records about big war contracts or valuable leftover war supplies. Violators can be fined or imprisoned up to five years.
Whoever willfully secretes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys—
any records of a war contractor relating to the negotiation, award, performance, payment, interim financing, cancellation or other termination, or settlement of a war contract of $25,000 or more; or
any records of a war contractor or purchaser relating to any disposition of termination inventory in which the consideration received by any war contractor or any government agency* is $5,000 or more,
before the lapse of (1) five years after such disposition of termination inventory by such war contractor or government agency, or (2) five years after the final settlement of such war contract, whichever applicable period is longer, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
The Administrator of General Services, by regulation, may authorize the destruction of such records upon such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate, including the requirement for the making and retaining of photographs or microphotographs, which shall have the same force and effect as the originals thereof.
The definitions of terms in section 103 1 of Title 41 shall apply to similar terms used in this section.
Source credit: (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 704; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 20(a), 65 Stat. 717; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §§ 330004(17), 330016(2)(F), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2142, 2148.)
- 1948Enacted · Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 645 · 62 Stat. 704
- 1951Amended · Act of Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655 · 65 Stat. 717
- 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-322 · 108 Stat. 2142, 2148
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 645 on 1948-06-25.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case