19 U.S.C. § 4587 — Identification of industries facing subsidized imports
submitted 33 years ago by Pub. L. 116-113 to r/title-19-CUSTOMS-DUTIES · 877 words · no verdicts yet
This section lets a United States industry representative ask the Trade Representative to identify an industry facing likely increased competition from subsidized imports and a likely decline in its competitive position. It sets the Trade Representative’s duties after identification, preserves other trade-law rights and proceedings, and leaves existing standing requirements unchanged.
(a) Petitions. An entity that represents a United States industry—including a trade association, firm, certified or recognized union, or group of workers—may file a petition with the Trade Representative asking that the industry be identified under this section. The entity must have reason to believe both of the following: (1) the industry is likely to face increased competition from subsidized imports with which it directly competes, either (A) from a USMCA country as a result of implementing the USMCA, or (B) from another country that the President designates, after consulting Congress, as benefiting from reduced tariffs or other trade barriers under a trade agreement that enters into force for the United States after January 1, 1994; and (2) the industry is likely to suffer a decline in its competitive position before more effective rules and limits on government subsidies have been developed for the country involved. This section does not define “USMCA,” “subsidized imports,” “United States industry,” or “competitive position.” (b) Identification of industry. Within 90 days after receiving a petition under subsection (a), the Trade Representative, consulting with the Secretary of Commerce, must decide whether to identify the industry. The decision must be based on whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the industry may face both the subsidization described in subsection (a)(1) and the decline described in subsection (a)(2). (c) Action after identification. At the request of an entity representing an industry identified under subsection (b), the Trade Representative must do one of the following: (1) compile and make available to the industry information under section 2418 of this title; (2) recommend to the President that the President request an investigation by the International Trade Commission under section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1332); or (3) take the actions described in both paragraphs (1) and (2). The industry may ask the Trade Representative to take appropriate action to update any information obtained under paragraph (1) or (2), or both, as often as once a year. The industry may make these update requests until the United States and the USMCA countries reach an agreement on more effective rules and limits relating to government subsidies. (d) Initiation of action under other law. (1) In general. The Trade Representative and the Secretary of Commerce must review the information obtained under subsection (c) and consult with the industry identified under subsection (b). They must do this to decide whether any action is appropriate: (A) under section 2411 of this title, including starting an investigation under section 2412(c) of this title, in the case of the Trade Representative; or (B) under subtitle A of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.), including starting an investigation under section 702(a) of that Act (19 U.S.C. 1671a(a)), in the case of the Secretary of Commerce. (2) Criteria for initiation. When deciding whether to start an investigation under section 2411 of this title or under any other trade law, except title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, the Trade Representative, after consulting with the Secretary of Commerce: (A) must seek advice from the advisory committees established under section 2155 of this title; (B) must consult with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives; (C) must coordinate with the interagency organization established under section 1872 of this title; and (D) may ask the President to request advice from the International Trade Commission. (3) Title III actions. If an investigation is started under section 2412(c) of this title as a result of a review under this subsection, and the Trade Representative decides, after that investigation—including any applicable dispute-settlement proceedings under the USMCA or another trade agreement—to take action under section 2411(a) of this title, the Trade Representative must give preference to actions that most directly affect the products that benefit from government subsidies and were the subject of the investigation. This preference requirement does not apply if those products have no significant imports, or if the Trade Representative otherwise decides that applying the action to other products would be more effective. This section does not define “Title III actions,” “government subsidies,” or “significant imports.” (e) Effect of decisions. Any decision under this section, whether positive or negative, and any action by the Trade Representative or the Secretary of Commerce under this section must not in any way: (1) prejudice an industry’s right to file a petition under any trade law; (2) prejudice, affect, or replace any proceeding, investigation, determination, or action by the Secretary of Commerce, the International Trade Commission, or the Trade Representative under such a petition; or (3) prejudice, affect, replace, or eliminate any proceeding, investigation, or determination under section 2411 of this title, title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.), or any other trade law. (f) Standing. Nothing in this section may be read to change in any way the standing requirements under any law of the United States that were in effect before January 29, 2020, or to add any additional standing requirements under any law of the United States. This section does not define “standing.”
Any entity, including a trade association, firm, certified or recognized union, or group of workers, that is representative of a United States industry and has reason to believe—
that—
as a result of implementation of provisions of the USMCA, the industry is likely to face increased competition from subsidized imports, from a USMCA country, with which it directly competes; or
the industry is likely to face increased competition from subsidized imports with which it directly competes from any other country designated by the President, following consultations with the Congress, as benefiting from a reduction of tariffs or other trade barriers under a trade agreement that enters into force with respect to the United States after January 1, 1994; and
that the industry is likely to experience a deterioration of its competitive position before more effective rules and disciplines relating to the use of government subsidies have been developed with respect to the country concerned;
may file with the Trade Representative a petition that such industry be identified under this section.
Within 90 days after receipt of a petition under subsection (a), the Trade Representative, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, shall decide whether to identify the industry on the basis that there is a reasonable likelihood that the industry may face both the subsidization described in subsection (a)(1) and the deterioration described in subsection (a)(2).
At the request of an entity that is representative of an industry identified under subsection (b), the Trade Representative shall—
compile and make available to the industry information under section 2418 of this title;
recommend to the President that an investigation by the International Trade Commission be requested under section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [19 U.S.C. 1332]; or
take actions described in both paragraphs (1) and (2).
The industry may request the Trade Representative to take appropriate action to update (as often as annually) any information obtained under paragraph (1) or (2), or both, as the case may be, until an agreement on more effective rules and disciplines relating to government subsidies is reached between the United States and the USMCA countries.
The Trade Representative and the Secretary of Commerce shall review information obtained under subsection (c) and consult with the industry identified under subsection (b) with a view to deciding whether any action is appropriate—
under section 2411 of this title, including the initiation of an investigation under section 2412(c) of this title (in the case of the Trade Representative); or
under subtitle A of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 [19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.], including the initiation of an investigation under section 702(a) of that Act [19 U.S.C. 1671a(a)] (in the case of the Secretary of Commerce).
In determining whether to initiate any investigation under section 2411 of this title or any other trade law, other than title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 [19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.], the Trade Representative, after consultation with the Secretary of Commerce—
shall seek the advice of the advisory committees established under section 2155 of this title;
shall consult with the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives;
shall coordinate with the interagency organization established under section 1872 of this title; and
may ask the President to request advice from the International Trade Commission.
In the event an investigation is initiated under section 2412(c) of this title as a result of a review under this subsection and the Trade Representative, following such investigation (including any applicable dispute settlement proceedings under the USMCA or any other trade agreement), determines to take action under section 2411(a) of this title, the Trade Representative shall give preference to actions that most directly affect the products that benefit from governmental subsidies and were the subject of the investigation, unless there are no significant imports of such products or the Trade Representative otherwise determines that application of the action to other products would be more effective.
Any decision, whether positive or negative, or any action by the Trade Representative or the Secretary of Commerce under this section shall not in any way—
prejudice the right of any industry to file a petition under any trade law;
prejudice, affect, or substitute for, any proceeding, investigation, determination, or action by the Secretary of Commerce, the International Trade Commission, or the Trade Representative pursuant to such a petition; or
prejudice, affect, substitute for, or obviate any proceeding, investigation, or determination under section 2411 of this title, title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 [19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.], or any other trade law.
Nothing in this section may be construed to alter in any manner the requirements in effect before January 29, 2020, for standing under any law of the United States or to add any additional requirements for standing under any law of the United States.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 116–113, title IV, § 417, formerly Pub. L. 103–182, title IV, § 407, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2138; Pub. L. 104–295, § 21(c)(2), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3530; renumbered § 417 of Pub. L. 116–113 and amended Pub. L. 116–113, title V, § 504(h), Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 75.)
- 1993Enacted · Pub. L. 116-113 · 107 Stat. 2138
- 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-295 · 110 Stat. 3530
- 2020Amended · Pub. L. 116-113 · 134 Stat. 75
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 116-113 on 1993-12-08.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case