ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

2 U.S.C. § 1535Least burdensome option or explanation required

submitted 31 years ago by Pub. L. 104-4 to r/title-2-THE-CONGRESS · 199 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Before issuing a rule requiring a written statement, an agency must consider alternatives and choose the least costly or burdensome one that meets the rule’s objectives for the affected governments or private sector. The agency may explain an exception, and OMB must report compliance.

(a) Unless (b) applies, before issuing a rule requiring a written statement under section 1532, an agency must identify and consider a reasonable number of alternatives and choose the least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative that achieves the rule’s objectives— for State, local, and tribal governments when the rule contains a Federal intergovernmental mandate, and for the private sector when it contains a Federal private-sector mandate. (b) The agency may use another method if its head publishes with the final rule why the least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome method was not adopted, or if this section would conflict with law. (c) No later than one year after March 22, 1995, the OMB Director must certify to Congress, with a written explanation, agency compliance and identify agencies and rulemakings that did not adequately comply.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b), before promulgating any rule for which a written statement is required under section 1532 of this title, the agency shall identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and from those alternatives select the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule, for—

(1)

State, local, and tribal governments, in the case of a rule containing a Federal intergovernmental mandate; and

(2)

the private sector, in the case of a rule containing a Federal private sector mandate.

(b) Exception

The provisions of subsection (a) shall apply unless—

(1)

the head of the affected agency publishes with the final rule an explanation of why the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome method of achieving the objectives of the rule was not adopted; or

(2)

the provisions are inconsistent with law.

(c) OMB certification

No later than 1 year after March 22, 1995, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall certify to Congress, with a written explanation, agency compliance with this section and include in that certification agencies and rulemakings that fail to adequately comply with this section.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 205, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 66.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1995Enacted · Pub. L. 104-4 · 109 Stat. 66

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 104-4 on 1995-03-22.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case