ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

2 U.S.C. § 186Library of Congress orders under task and delivery order contracts

submitted 4 years ago by Pub. L. 117-103 to r/title-2-THE-CONGRESS · 184 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law limits how the Library of Congress uses task and delivery order contracts. An order placed under such a contract can't expand the contract's scope, length, or value. Bid protests over these orders are limited, mostly to big orders or scope violations.

(a) Contract modifications: When the Librarian of Congress issues an order under a "task order contract" or "delivery order contract" (specific contract types defined in section 4101 of title 41), that order can't make the underlying contract bigger — it can't increase the contract's scope, time period, or maximum dollar value. Only a formal modification of the contract itself can do that. (b) Omitted: This subsection is not used in the published law. (c) Protests: (1) Normally, companies can protest contract orders. But a protest against an order under this section isn't allowed unless it either: (A) claims the order broke the rule in (a) by expanding the contract; or (B) involves an order worth more than $10,000,000. (2) For protests allowed under (1)(B), the Comptroller General — not the usual process — has sole authority to decide them. (d) Effective date: This section applies starting with fiscal year 2022 and every fiscal year after.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Contract modifications

An order issued under a task order contract or a delivery order contract (as such terms are defined in section 4101 of title 41) entered into by the Librarian of Congress may not increase the scope, period, or maximum value of the contract under which the order is issued. The scope, period, or maximum value of the contract may be increased only by modification of the contract.

(b) Omitted

(c) Protests
(1) Protest not authorized

A protest to an order described in subsection (a) filed pursuant to the procedures in subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31 is not authorized unless such protest—

(A)

is an objection on the basis that the order is in violation of subsection (a); or

(B)

concerns an order valued in excess of $10,000,000.

(2) Jurisdiction over protests

Notwithstanding section 3556 of title 31, the Comptroller General shall have exclusive jurisdiction of a protest authorized under paragraph (1)(B).

(d) Effective date

This section and the amendment made by this section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2022 and each succeeding fiscal year.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 117–103, div. I, title I, § 142, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 519.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2022Enacted · Pub. L. 117-103 · 136 Stat. 519

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 117-103 on 2022-03-15.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case