21 U.S.C. § 351 — Adulterated drugs and devices
submitted 88 years ago by ch. 675 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 1,581 words · no verdicts yet
A drug or device is "adulterated" if it's filthy or made in dirty conditions. It's also adulterated if it's weaker or less pure than claimed. A drug or device is adulterated too if it's banned, unsafe, or blocks inspection.
A drug* or device counts as "adulterated" under any of the following rules.
(a) Poisonous or unsanitary ingredients, inadequate manufacturing controls. It's adulterated if it contains, even partly, any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance; or if it was prepared, packed, or stored under unsanitary conditions that could have let filth contaminate it or made it harmful; or if it's a drug whose manufacturing, processing, packing, or storage methods, facilities, or controls don't follow "current good manufacturing practice" — the standards needed to guarantee the drug is safe and truly has the identity, strength, quality, and purity it claims; or if it's a compounded positron emission tomography drug* whose compounding methods, facilities, or controls don't follow the positron emission tomography compounding standards and the official monographs of the United States Pharmacopoeia, which exist to guarantee that same safety, identity, strength, quality, and purity. It's also adulterated if its container is partly made of a poisonous or harmful substance that could make the contents dangerous; if it contains a color additive*, used only for coloring, that's unsafe under the color*-additive safety rules, or if it is itself such an unsafe color additive meant for coloring drugs or devices; if it's a new animal drug* that's unsafe under the new-animal-drug rules; or if it's animal feed containing a new animal drug that's unsafe under those same rules.
(b) Differing from an official compendium's standard. A drug supposed to be one recognized in an official compendium*, like the United States Pharmacopoeia, is adulterated if its strength, quality, or purity doesn't match that compendium's standard, tested using the compendium's own methods. If the compendium doesn't specify a test, or its test is inadequate in the FDA's judgment, the FDA must first ask the compendium's governing body to fix it; if that body doesn't act in reasonable time, the FDA can write its own testing regulation. A drug isn't adulterated under this rule just because it differs from the compendium standard, as long as the difference is clearly stated on its label*. A drug listed in both the United States Pharmacopoeia and the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia must meet the former's standards, unless it's labeled and sold as a homeopathic drug, in which case the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia's standards apply instead.
(c) Misrepresenting strength when not covered by a compendium. If a drug isn't covered by (b), it's adulterated if its actual strength, purity, or quality falls short of what it claims to be.
(d) Mixed with or substituted by another substance. It's adulterated if another substance has been mixed or packed into it in a way that lowers its quality or strength, or if part or all of it has been substituted with something else.
(e) Devices failing performance standards. A device is adulterated if it is, or claims to be, subject to a performance standard but doesn't fully meet it, or if it's declared or represented as meeting a recognized standard but doesn't fully meet it.
(f) Certain Class III devices without required approval. A Class III device is adulterated if an FDA order requires it to have premarket approval, it isn't exempt, and either no premarket-approval application, or product-development-protocol notice, was filed within 90 days of that order, or one was filed but denied, suspended, or withdrawn, or the protocol was declared incomplete or its approval withdrawn; or if it was classified into Class III, needs an approved premarket application, isn't exempt, and its application has been suspended or is otherwise not in effect; or if it was classified into Class III under a related provision requiring an approved application, and that application has been suspended or is otherwise not in effect. For an investigational Class III device, this rule doesn't apply until 90 days after FDA issues the regulations required for investigational-use exemptions. For a device subject to a premarket-approval order, this rule doesn't apply until the later of 30 months after the device's Class III classification took effect, or 90 days after the order issued. For a device covered by a premarket-approval regulation issued before July 9, 2012, references here to a premarket-approval order include that regulation.
(g) Banned devices. A device the FDA has banned is adulterated.
(h) Manufacturing, packing, storage, or installation not meeting requirements. A device is adulterated if its manufacturing, packing, storage, or installation methods, facilities, or controls don't meet the applicable requirements, or a condition set by an FDA order.
(i) Failing investigational-use exemption requirements. A device with an investigational-use exemption is adulterated if either the person* who got the exemption or an investigator using the device fails to follow a requirement set under that exemption.
(j) Blocking an FDA inspection. A drug or device is adulterated if it was made, processed, packed, or stored in a facility whose owner, operator, or agent delays, denies, or limits an FDA inspection, or refuses to allow entry or inspection.
Finally, for purposes of the current-good-manufacturing-practice rule in (a), that term includes overseeing and controlling drug manufacturing to ensure quality — including managing the risks of, and confirming the safety of, raw materials, manufacturing materials, and finished drug products.
facts
A drug* or device shall be deemed to be adulterated—
If it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance; or (2)(A) if it has been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health; or (B) if it is a drug and the methods used in, or the facilities or controls used for, its manufacture, processing, packing, or holding do not conform to or are not operated or administered in conformity with current good manufacturing practice to assure that such drug meets the requirements of this chapter as to safety and has the identity and strength, and meets the quality and purity characteristics, which it purports or is represented to possess; or (C) if it is a compounded positron emission tomography drug* and the methods used in, or the facilities and controls used for, its compounding, processing, packing, or holding do not conform to or are not operated or administered in conformity with the positron emission tomography compounding standards and the official monographs of the United States Pharmacopoeia to assure that such drug meets the requirements of this chapter as to safety and has the identity and strength, and meets the quality and purity characteristics, that it purports or is represented to possess; or (3) if its container is composed, in whole or in part, of any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render the contents injurious to health; or (4) if (A) it bears or contains, for purposes of coloring only, a color additive* which is unsafe within the meaning of section 379e(a) of this title, or (B) it is a color* additive the intended use of which in or on drugs or devices is for purposes of coloring only and is unsafe within the meaning of section 379e(a) of this title; or (5) if it is a new animal drug* which is unsafe within the meaning of section 360b of this title; or (6) if it is an animal feed bearing or containing a new animal drug, and such animal feed is unsafe within the meaning of section 360b of this title.
If it purports to be or is represented as a drug the name of which is recognized in an official compendium, and its strength differs from, or its quality or purity falls below, the standard set forth in such compendium. Such determination as to strength, quality, or purity shall be made in accordance with the tests or methods of assay set forth in such compendium, except that whenever tests or methods of assay have not been prescribed in such compendium, or such tests or methods of assay as are prescribed are, in the judgment of the Secretary*, insufficient for the making of such determination, the Secretary shall bring such fact to the attention of the appropriate body charged with the revision of such compendium, and if such body fails within a reasonable time to prescribe tests or methods of assay which, in the judgment of the Secretary, are sufficient for purposes of this paragraph, then the Secretary shall promulgate regulations prescribing appropriate tests or methods of assay in accordance with which such determination as to strength, quality, or purity shall be made. No drug defined in an official compendium shall be deemed to be adulterated under this paragraph because it differs from the standard of strength, quality, or purity therefor set forth in such compendium, if its difference in strength, quality, or purity from such standard is plainly stated on its label*. Whenever a drug is recognized in both the United States Pharmacopoeia and the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States it shall be subject to the requirements of the United States Pharmacopoeia unless it is labeled and offered for sale as a homoeopathic drug, in which case it shall be subject to the provisions of the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States and not to those of the United States Pharmacopoeia.
If it is not subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section and its strength differs from, or its purity or quality falls below, that which it purports or is represented to possess.
If it is a drug and any substance has been (1) mixed or packed therewith so as to reduce its quality or strength or (2) substituted wholly or in part therefor.
If it is, or purports to be or is represented as, a device which is subject to a performance standard established under section 360d of this title unless such device is in all respects in conformity with such standard.
If it is declared to be, purports to be, or is represented as, a device that is in conformity with any standard recognized under section 360d(c) of this title unless such device is in all respects in conformity with such standard.
If it is a class III device—
which is required by an order issued under subsection (b) of section 360e of this title to have an approval under such section of an application for premarket approval and which is not exempt from section 360e of this title under section 360j(g) of this title, and
for which an application for premarket approval or a notice of completion of a product development protocol was not filed with the Secretary within the ninety-day period beginning on the date of the issuance of such order, or
for which such an application was filed and approval of the application has been denied, suspended, or withdrawn, or such a notice was filed and has been declared not completed or the approval of the device under the protocol has been withdrawn;
which was classified under section 360c(f) of this title into class III, which under section 360e(a) of this title is required to have in effect an approved application for premarket approval, and which is not exempt from section 360e of this title under section 360j(g) of this title, and
which has an application which has been suspended or is otherwise not in effect; or
which was classified under section 360j(l) of this title into class III, which under such section is required to have in effect an approved application under section 360e of this title, and which has an application which has been suspended or is otherwise not in effect.
In the case of a device classified under section 360c(f) of this title into class III and intended solely for investigational use, paragraph 1 (1)(B) shall not apply with respect to such device during the period ending on the ninetieth day after the date of the promulgation of the regulations prescribing the procedures and conditions required by section 360j(g)(2) of this title.
In the case of a device subject to an order issued under subsection (b) of section 360e of this title, paragraph 1 (1) shall not apply with respect to such device during the period ending—
on the last day of the thirtieth calendar month beginning after the month in which the classification of the device in class III became effective under section 360c of this title, or
on the ninetieth day after the date of the issuance of such order,
whichever occurs later.
In the case of a device with respect to which a regulation was promulgated under section 360e(b) of this title prior to July 9, 2012, a reference in this subsection to an order issued under section 360e(b) of this title shall be deemed to include such regulation.
If it is a banned device.
If it is a device and the methods used in, or the facilities or controls used for, its manufacture, packing, storage, or installation are not in conformity with applicable requirements under section 360j(f)(1) of this title or an applicable condition prescribed by an order under section 360j(f)(2) of this title.
If it is a device for which an exemption has been granted under section 360j(g) of this title for investigational use and the person* who was granted such exemption or any investigator who uses such device under such exemption fails to comply with a requirement prescribed by or under such section.
If it is a drug or device and it has been manufactured, processed, packed, or held in any factory, warehouse, or establishment and the owner, operator, or agent of such factory, warehouse, or establishment delays, denies, or limits an inspection, or refuses to permit entry or inspection.
For purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(B), the term “current good manufacturing practice” includes the implementation of oversight and controls over the manufacture of drugs to ensure quality, including managing the risk of and establishing the safety of raw materials, materials used in the manufacturing of drugs, and finished drug products.
Source credit: (June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 501, 52 Stat. 1049; Pub. L. 86–618, title I, § 102(b)(1), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 398; Pub. L. 87–781, title I, § 101, Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 780; Pub. L. 90–399, § 101(a), July 13, 1968, 82 Stat. 343; Pub. L. 94–295, §§ 3(d), 9(b)(1), May 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 576, 583; Pub. L. 101–629, § 9(b), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4521; Pub. L. 102–571, title I, § 107(8), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4499; Pub. L. 105–115, title I, § 121(b)(1), title II, § 204(c), Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2320, 2336; Pub. L. 112–144, title VI, § 608(b)(2), title VII, §§ 707(a), 711, July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1058, 1068, 1071; Pub. L. 115–52, title VII, § 702(c), Aug. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 1056.)
- 1938Enacted · Act of June 25, 1938, ch. 675 · 52 Stat. 1049
- 1960Amended · Pub. L. 86-618 · 74 Stat. 398
- 1962Amended · Pub. L. 87-781 · 76 Stat. 780
- 1968Amended · Pub. L. 90-399 · 82 Stat. 343
- 1976Amended · Pub. L. 94-295 · 90 Stat. 576, 583
- 1990Amended · Pub. L. 101-629 · 104 Stat. 4521
- 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-571 · 106 Stat. 4499
- 1997Amended · Pub. L. 105-115 · 111 Stat. 2320, 2336
- 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-144 · 126 Stat. 1058, 1068, 1071
- 2017Amended · Pub. L. 115-52 · 131 Stat. 1056
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case