ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

21 U.S.C. § 360a–1Clinical trials

submitted 14 years ago by Pub. L. 112-144 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 433 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Each year, the Secretary of Health and Human Services must review and, where appropriate, update at least three FDA guidance documents on antibacterial and antifungal drug trials. A company developing a drug meant to fight a serious infectious pathogen can ask the Secretary for written advice on what studies the drug needs before approval.

(a) Review and revision of guidance documents (1) In general Each year, the Secretary must review, and revise where appropriate, at least 3 FDA guidance documents. This includes (A) reviewing FDA's guidance on how to run clinical trials for antibacterial and antifungal drugs, and (B) updating those documents, where appropriate, to reflect new scientific and medical developments and to make the approval procedures and requirements under chapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act clearer. (2) Issues for review At a minimum, this yearly review must cover: the right animal models of infection, in vitro (lab) testing techniques, valid microbiological surrogate markers, whether to use noninferiority trials or superiority trials, how trials enroll patients, what data the trials must collect, and the correct "delta" values — the allowed margin of difference — for noninferiority trials. (3) Rule of construction Except for the updates the Secretary makes under (1)(B), nothing in this section cancels or changes FDA's existing guidance documents. (b) Recommendations for investigations (1) Request The sponsor of a drug meant to be designated a "qualified infectious disease product" can ask the Secretary for written recommendations. The sponsor wants to know what non-clinical and clinical investigations the Secretary believes may be needed before the drug can be approved under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, for treating, detecting, preventing, or identifying a "qualifying pathogen" — a term defined in section 505E of that Act. (2) Recommendations If the Secretary has reason to believe the drug really is a qualified infectious disease product, the Secretary must give the sponsor written recommendations. Those cover the non-clinical and clinical investigations the Secretary believes, based on the information available at the time of the request, would be necessary for approval for the use described in paragraph (1). (c) Qualified infectious disease product In this section, "qualified infectious disease product" has the meaning given in section 505E(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Review and revision of guidance documents
(1) In general

The Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in this section as the “Secretary”) shall review and, as appropriate, revise not fewer than 3 guidance documents per year, which shall include—

(A)

reviewing the guidance documents of the Food and Drug Administration for the conduct of clinical trials with respect to antibacterial and antifungal drugs; and

(B)

as appropriate, revising such guidance documents to reflect developments in scientific and medical information and technology and to ensure clarity regarding the procedures and requirements for approval of antibacterial and antifungal drugs under chapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 351 et seq.).

(2) Issues for review

At a minimum, the review under paragraph (1) shall address the appropriate animal models of infection, in vitro techniques, valid microbiological surrogate markers, the use of noninferiority versus superiority trials, trial enrollment, data requirements, and appropriate delta values for noninferiority trials.

(3) Rule of construction

Except to the extent to which the Secretary makes revisions under paragraph (1)(B), nothing in this section shall be construed to repeal or otherwise effect the guidance documents of the Food and Drug Administration.

(b) Recommendations for investigations
(1) Request

The sponsor of a drug intended to be designated as a qualified infectious disease product may request that the Secretary provide written recommendations for nonclinical and clinical investigations which the Secretary believes may be necessary to be conducted with the drug before such drug may be approved under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) for use in treating, detecting, preventing, or identifying a qualifying pathogen, as defined in section 505E of such Act [21 U.S.C. 355f].

(2) Recommendations

If the Secretary has reason to believe that a drug for which a request is made under this subsection is a qualified infectious disease product, the Secretary shall provide the person making the request written recommendations for the nonclinical and clinical investigations which the Secretary believes, on the basis of information available to the Secretary at the time of the request, would be necessary for approval under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) of such drug for the use described in paragraph (1).

(c) Qualified infectious disease product

For purposes of this section, the term “qualified infectious disease product” has the meaning given such term in section 505E(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 355f(g)], as added by section 801 of this Act.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 112–144, title VIII, § 804, July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 1080.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2012Enacted · Pub. L. 112-144 · 126 Stat. 1080

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 112-144 on 2012-07-09.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case