ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

21 U.S.C. § 379oEnvironmental impact

submitted 88 years ago by Pub. L. 105-115 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 70 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

An environmental impact statement made under 1997 FDA rules counts as meeting a separate, stricter federal law's requirement. This applies to actions, recommendations, or reports made under this chapter.

No matter what any other law says, an environmental impact statement is treated as valid if it follows the rules published in part 25 of title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as those rules stood on August 31, 1997. This applies to a statement prepared for an action carried out under this chapter, or for a recommendation or report related to this chapter. A statement that meets that standard is considered to satisfy the "detailed statement" requirement under section 4332(2)(C) of title 42 — a separate federal environmental law.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an environmental impact statement prepared in accordance with the regulations published in part 25 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on August 31, 1997) in connection with an action carried out under (or a recommendation or report relating to) this chapter, shall be considered to meet the requirements for a detailed statement under section 4332(2)(C) of title 42.

Source credit: (June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 749, formerly § 746, as added Pub. L. 105–115, title IV, § 411, Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2373; renumbered § 749, Pub. L. 110–316, title II, § 202(a), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3515.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1938Enacted · Pub. L. 105-115 · 111 Stat. 2373
  • 2008Amended · Pub. L. 110-316 · 122 Stat. 3515

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 105-115 on 1938-06-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case