22 U.S.C. § 262d–1 — Congressional statement of policy of human rights and United States assistance policies with international institutions
submitted 49 years ago by Pub. L. 95-148 to r/title-22-FOREIGN-RELATIONS-AND-INTERCOURSE · 119 words · no verdicts yet
Congress believes U.S. reps at five development banks should oppose loans to human-rights abusers. Exceptions apply if other methods work better or if aid helps the country's poorest people. Another exception applies if the President decides opposing votes would hurt human rights more.
It is the sense of the Congress that, where other means have proven ineffective in promoting international human rights, and except where the President determines that the cause of international human rights is served more effectively by actions other than voting against such assistance or where the assistance is directed to programs that serve the basic needs of the impoverished majority of the country in question, United States representatives to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Development Association, the African Development Fund, the Asian Development Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank should oppose loans and other financial or technical assistance to any country that persists in a systematic pattern of gross violations of fundamental human rights.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 95–148, title V, § 507, Oct. 31, 1977, 91 Stat. 1240.)
- 1977Enacted · Pub. L. 95-148 · 91 Stat. 1240
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-148 on 1977-10-31.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case