ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

22 U.S.C. § 7552 — Sense of Congress regarding protecting Afghanistan’s President

submitted 24 years ago by Pub. L. 107-327 to r/title-22-FOREIGN-RELATIONS-AND-INTERCOURSE · 95 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress believes U.S. personnel, not private contractors, should protect Afghanistan's President. Allied countries should be invited to send active-duty security personnel too. This protection arrangement should be temporary until Afghan forces can take over.

It is the sense of Congress that: (1) any U.S. physical protection force guarding the President of Afghanistan should consist of U.S. diplomatic security, law-enforcement, or military personnel — not private contractors performing the actual physical protection; (2) U.S. allies should be invited to volunteer active-duty military or law-enforcement personnel for this protection force; and (3) this protection force should be limited in time and should be replaced by qualified Afghan security forces as soon as practical.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)

any United States physical protection force provided for the personal security of the President of Afghanistan should be composed of United States diplomatic security, law-enforcement, or military personnel, and should not utilize private contracted personnel to provide actual physical protection services;

(2)

United States allies should be invited to volunteer active-duty military or law enforcement personnel to participate in such a protection force; and

(3)

such a protection force should be limited in duration and should be succeeded by qualified Afghan security forces as soon as practicable.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 107–327, title III, § 302, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2812.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2002Enacted · Pub. L. 107-327 · 116 Stat. 2812

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 107-327 on 2002-12-04.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case