ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

28 U.S.C. § 1351 — Consuls, vice consuls, and members of a diplomatic mission as defendant

submitted 78 years ago by ch. 646 to r/title-28-JUDICIARY-AND-JUDICIAL-PROCEDURE · 53 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Federal district courts have exclusive jurisdiction over all civil actions and proceedings against foreign consuls, vice consuls, and specified members of diplomatic missions or their families.

The district courts have original jurisdiction, exclusive of State courts, over all civil actions and proceedings against (1) consuls or vice consuls of foreign states, or (2) members of a mission or members of their families. This section says that “members of a mission” and “members of their families” have the meanings given in section 2 of the Diplomatic Relations Act; this section does not define those terms.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all civil actions and proceedings against—

(1)

consuls or vice consuls of foreign states; or

(2)

members of a mission or members of their families (as such terms are defined in section 2 of the Diplomatic Relations Act).

Source credit: (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 80(c), 63 Stat. 101; Pub. L. 95–393, § 8(a)(1), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 810.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1948Enacted · Act of June 25, 1948, ch. 646 · 62 Stat. 934
  • 1949Amended · Act of May 24, 1949, ch. 139 · 63 Stat. 101
  • 1978Amended · Pub. L. 95-393 · 92 Stat. 810

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 646 on 1948-06-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case