ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

29 U.S.C. § 662 — Injunction proceedings

submitted 56 years ago by Pub. L. 91-596 to r/title-29-LABOR · 427 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section lets district courts restrain conditions posing an imminent danger of death or serious physical harm. It sets procedures for temporary relief, notice to employees and employers, and court action if the Secretary arbitrarily refuses to seek relief.

(a) Petition to restrain imminent dangers. On the Secretary’s petition, a United States district court has jurisdiction to restrain employment conditions or practices where a danger could reasonably be expected to cause death or serious physical harm immediately, or before normal enforcement procedures could eliminate the danger. An order may require steps needed to avoid, correct, or remove the danger and may prohibit anyone from working or being present where it exists. The prohibition does not cover people needed to remove or correct the danger, maintain a continuous-process operation’s ability to restart without completely stopping it, or safely and orderly stop operations when stopping is necessary.

(b) Temporary relief. When the petition is filed, the court may grant an injunction or temporary restraining order while the enforcement proceeding is pending. Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs, but a no-notice temporary restraining order may not last more than five days.

(c) Inspector’s notice. As soon as an inspector concludes that subsection (a) conditions or practices exist, the inspector must tell affected employees and employers about the danger and the recommendation that the Secretary seek relief.

(d) Secretary’s failure; mandamus. If the Secretary arbitrarily or capriciously refuses to seek relief, an employee who may be injured, or the employees’ representative, may sue in the district where the danger allegedly exists, where the employer’s main office is, or the District of Columbia, seeking a writ of mandamus compelling the Secretary to seek the order and any other appropriate relief.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Petition by Secretary to restrain imminent dangers; scope of order

The United States district courts shall have jurisdiction, upon petition of the Secretary, to restrain any conditions or practices in any place of employment which are such that a danger exists which could reasonably be expected to cause death or serious physical harm immediately or before the imminence of such danger can be eliminated through the enforcement procedures otherwise provided by this chapter. Any order issued under this section may require such steps to be taken as may be necessary to avoid, correct, or remove such imminent danger and prohibit the employment or presence of any individual in locations or under conditions where such imminent danger exists, except individuals whose presence is necessary to avoid, correct, or remove such imminent danger or to maintain the capacity of a continuous process operation to resume normal operations without a complete cessation of operations, or where a cessation of operations is necessary, to permit such to be accomplished in a safe and orderly manner.

(b) Appropriate injunctive relief or temporary restraining order pending outcome of enforcement proceeding; applicability of Rule 65 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Upon the filing of any such petition the district court shall have jurisdiction to grant such injunctive relief or temporary restraining order pending the outcome of an enforcement proceeding pursuant to this chapter. The proceeding shall be as provided by Rule 65 of the Federal Rules, Civil Procedure, except that no temporary restraining order issued without notice shall be effective for a period longer than five days.

(c) Notification of affected employees and employers by inspector of danger and of recommendation to Secretary to seek relief

Whenever and as soon as an inspector concludes that conditions or practices described in subsection (a) exist in any place of employment, he shall inform the affected employees and employers of the danger and that he is recommending to the Secretary that relief be sought.

(d) Failure of Secretary to seek relief; writ of mandamus

If the Secretary arbitrarily or capriciously fails to seek relief under this section, any employee who may be injured by reason of such failure, or the representative of such employees, might bring an action against the Secretary in the United States district court for the district in which the imminent danger is alleged to exist or the employer has its principal office, or for the District of Columbia, for a writ of mandamus to compel the Secretary to seek such an order and for such further relief as may be appropriate.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 91–596, § 13, Dec. 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 1605.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1970Enacted · Pub. L. 91-596 · 84 Stat. 1605

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 91-596 on 1970-12-29.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case