33 U.S.C. § 420 — Piers and cribs on Mississippi and St. Croix Rivers
submitted 144 years ago by Congress to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 138 words · no verdicts yet
Sawmill owners on the Mississippi and St. Croix Rivers may build piers to protect their mills. The Secretary of the Army oversees this, and the piers can't block river navigation. The government can remove any pier that blocks navigation, at the owner's cost.
Sawmill owners on the Mississippi River and the St. Croix River, in Wisconsin and Minnesota, are allowed to build piers or cribs in front of their mill property. These structures protect their mills and log rafts from flood and ice damage.
The Secretary of the Army directs how this is done. The piers or cribs must not interfere with or block river navigation.
If a pier or crib built under this law ever ends up blocking navigation, for any reason, the government can remove it — or order it removed — and charge the cost to the owner.
The owners of sawmills on the Mississippi River and the Saint Croix River in the States of Wisconsin and Minnesota are authorized and empowered under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, to construct piers or cribs in front of their mill property on the banks of the river, for the protection of their mills and rafts against damage by floods and ice: Provided, however, That the piers or cribs so constructed shall not interfere with or obstruct the navigation of the river. And in case any pier or crib constructed under authority of this section shall at any time, and for any cause, be found to obstruct the navigation of the river, the Government expressly reserves the right to remove or direct the removal of it, at the cost and expense of the owners thereof.
Source credit: (R.S. § 5254; May 1, 1882, ch. 112, 22 Stat. 52; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, § 205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)
- 1882Enacted · Act of May 1, 1882, ch. 112 · 22 Stat. 52
- 1947Amended · Act of July 26, 1947, ch. 343 · 61 Stat. 501
A history note hasn’t been published yet.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case