ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

34 U.S.C. § 12542 — Rural drug enforcement training

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-322 to r/title-34-CRIME-CONTROL-AND-LAW-ENFORCEMENT · 86 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center must create specialized drug-investigation training for officers from rural agencies. The section authorizes $1 million for each fiscal year from 1996 through 2000.

(a) Specialized training for rural officers. The Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center must develop a specialized course for rural-agency law-enforcement officers on investigating drug trafficking and related crimes.

(b) Authorization of appropriations. The law authorizes these amounts for subsection (a): (1) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1996; (2) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1997; (3) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1998; (4) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1999; and (5) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2000.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Specialized training for rural officers

The Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center shall develop a specialized course of instruction devoted to training law enforcement officers from rural agencies in the investigation of drug trafficking and related crimes.

(b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out subsection (a)—

(1)

$1,000,000 for fiscal year 1996;

(2)

$1,000,000 for fiscal year 1997;

(3)

$1,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

(4)

$1,000,000 for fiscal year 1999; and

(5)

$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2000.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–322, title XVIII, § 180103, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2046.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-322 · 108 Stat. 2046

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-322 on 1994-09-13.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case