ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

34 U.S.C. § 40722DNA training and education for law enforcement, correctional personnel, and court officers

submitted 22 years ago by Pub. L. 108-405 to r/title-34-CRIME-CONTROL-AND-LAW-ENFORCEMENT · 114 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

The Attorney General shall make grants to provide training, technical assistance, education, and information relating to the identification, collection, preservation, analysis, and use of DNA samples and DNA evidence by—

(1)

law enforcement personnel, including police officers and other first responders, evidence technicians, investigators, and others who collect or examine evidence of crime;

(2)

court officers, including State and local prosecutors, defense lawyers, and judges;

(3)

forensic science professionals; and

(4)

corrections personnel, including prison and jail personnel, and probation, parole, and other officers involved in supervision.

(b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated $12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2024 to carry out this section.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 108–405, title III, § 303, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2273; Pub. L. 110–360, § 3, Oct. 8, 2008, 122 Stat. 4008; Pub. L. 113–182, § 3, Sept. 29, 2014, 128 Stat. 1918; Pub. L. 116–104, § 3, Dec. 30, 2019, 133 Stat. 3272.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2004Enacted · Pub. L. 108-405 · 118 Stat. 2273
  • 2008Amended · Pub. L. 110-360 · 122 Stat. 4008
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-182 · 128 Stat. 1918
  • 2019Amended · Pub. L. 116-104 · 133 Stat. 3272

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-405 on 2004-10-30.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case