ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

34 U.S.C. § 41310Report on theft of trade secrets occurring abroad

submitted 10 years ago by Pub. L. 114-153 to r/title-34-CRIME-CONTROL-AND-LAW-ENFORCEMENT · 517 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Attorney General must report every two years on trade secret theft against U.S. companies happening outside the country. The report covers how big the problem is, whether foreign governments are involved, and what protections each trading partner offers. It must also recommend actions to reduce the threat.

(a) Definitions. (1) "Director" means the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2) "Foreign instrumentality," "foreign agent," and "trade secret" carry the meanings given in section 1839 of title 18. (3) "State" includes the District of Columbia and any U.S. commonwealth, territory, or possession. (4) "United States company" means an organization formed under U.S. or state law, or that of a political subdivision. (b) The report. Within 1 year after May 11, 2016, and every two years after that, the Attorney General — working with the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, the Director, and other agency heads — must send Congress a report, post it on the Justice Department website, and share it with the public. The report must cover: (1) how widespread trade secret theft against U.S. companies is outside the U.S.; (2) how much of that theft is backed by foreign governments, instrumentalities, or agents; (3) the threat this theft poses; (4) how well trade secret owners can prevent theft abroad, enforce judgments against foreign entities, and block imports based on stolen trade secrets; (5) a country-by-country breakdown of trade secret protections and enforcement for U.S. trading partners, including which countries are a significant problem; (6) cases where the federal government worked with foreign countries to investigate, arrest, and prosecute people involved in trade secret theft; (7) progress made under trade agreements and treaties, including new foreign remedies to protect U.S. companies' trade secrets; and (8) recommended legislative and executive actions to (A) reduce the threat and economic harm from trade secret theft abroad, (B) educate U.S. companies about these threats, (C) help U.S. companies reduce their risk, and (D) let U.S. companies confidentially or anonymously report trade secret theft abroad.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Definitions

In this section:

(1) Director

The term “Director” means the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

(2) Foreign instrumentality, etc.

The terms “foreign instrumentality”, “foreign agent”, and “trade secret” have the meanings given those terms in section 1839 of title 18.

(3) State

The term “State” includes the District of Columbia and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

(4) United States company

The term “United States company” means an organization organized under the laws of the United States or a State or political subdivision thereof.

(b) Reports

Not later than 1 year after May 11, 2016, and biannually thereafter, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, the Director, and the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and make publicly available on the Web site of the Department of Justice and disseminate to the public through such other means as the Attorney General may identify, a report on the following:

(1)

The scope and breadth of the theft of the trade secrets of United States companies occurring outside of the United States.

(2)

The extent to which theft of trade secrets occurring outside of the United States is sponsored by foreign governments, foreign instrumentalities, or foreign agents.

(3)

The threat posed by theft of trade secrets occurring outside of the United States.

(4)

The ability and limitations of trade secret owners to prevent the misappropriation of trade secrets outside of the United States, to enforce any judgment against foreign entities for theft of trade secrets, and to prevent imports based on theft of trade secrets overseas.

(5)

A breakdown of the trade secret protections afforded United States companies by each country that is a trading partner of the United States and enforcement efforts available and undertaken in each such country, including a list identifying specific countries where trade secret theft, laws, or enforcement is a significant problem for United States companies.

(6)

Instances of the Federal Government working with foreign countries to investigate, arrest, and prosecute entities and individuals involved in the theft of trade secrets outside of the United States.

(7)

Specific progress made under trade agreements and treaties, including any new remedies enacted by foreign countries, to protect against theft of trade secrets of United States companies outside of the United States.

(8)

Recommendations of legislative and executive branch actions that may be undertaken to—

(A)

reduce the threat of and economic impact caused by the theft of the trade secrets of United States companies occurring outside of the United States;

(B)

educate United States companies regarding the threats to their trade secrets when taken outside of the United States;

(C)

provide assistance to United States companies to reduce the risk of loss of their trade secrets when taken outside of the United States; and

(D)

provide a mechanism for United States companies to confidentially or anonymously report the theft of trade secrets occurring outside of the United States.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 114–153, § 4, May 11, 2016, 130 Stat. 382.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2016Enacted · Pub. L. 114-153 · 130 Stat. 382

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 114-153 on 2016-05-11.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case