35 U.S.C. § 103 — Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter
submitted 74 years ago by ch. 950 to r/title-35-PATENTS · 87 words · no verdicts yet
This section sets the "non-obvious" rule for patents. Even if an invention isn't identical to something in the prior art, it still can't be patented if the differences would have been obvious to a skilled person in that field before the filing date. How the invention was actually made doesn't matter.
A patent for a claimed invention* may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention* is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Source credit: (July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 798; Pub. L. 98–622, title I, § 103, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3384; Pub. L. 104–41, § 1, Nov. 1, 1995, 109 Stat. 351; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4807(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–591; Pub. L. 108–453, § 2, Dec. 10, 2004, 118 Stat. 3596; Pub. L. 112–29, §§ 3(c), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 287, 335.)
- 1952Enacted · Act of July 19, 1952, ch. 950 · 66 Stat. 798
- 1984Amended · Pub. L. 98-622 · 98 Stat. 3384
- 1995Amended · Pub. L. 104-41 · 109 Stat. 351
- 1999Amended · Pub. L. 106-113 · 113 Stat. 1536, 1501
- 2004Amended · Pub. L. 108-453 · 118 Stat. 3596
- 2011Amended · Pub. L. 112-29 · 125 Stat. 287, 335
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 950 on 1952-07-19.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case