ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

35 U.S.C. § 102Conditions for patentability; novelty

submitted 74 years ago by ch. 950 to r/title-35-PATENTS · 614 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section sets the novelty rule for getting a patent. An inventor cannot patent something that was already public — patented, published, used, sold, or otherwise available — before their filing date. It also carves out exceptions for the inventor's own recent disclosures and for shared research.

(a) Novelty; Prior Art. A person can get a patent unless: (1) the claimed invention was already patented, described in a printed publication, used publicly, sold, or otherwise made available to the public before the invention's effective filing date; or (2) the claimed invention was already described in an issued patent, or in a published patent application, that names a different inventor and was effectively filed before this invention's filing date. (b) Exceptions. (1) Disclosures made one year or less before the filing date. A disclosure made within a year of the filing date does not count as prior art under (a)(1) if: (A) the inventor (or a joint inventor) made the disclosure, or someone got the information directly or indirectly from the inventor and then disclosed it; or (B) before that disclosure, the inventor or joint inventor — or someone who got the information from them — had already publicly disclosed the same subject matter. (2) Disclosures in applications and patents. A disclosure does not count as prior art under (a)(2) if: (A) the disclosed information came directly or indirectly from the inventor or joint inventor; (B) before the other application was effectively filed, the inventor, joint inventor, or someone who got the information from them, had already publicly disclosed that same subject matter; or (C) by the invention's filing date, the disclosed subject matter and the claimed invention were owned by the same person, or both were obligated to be assigned to the same person. (c) Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements. To apply the same-ownership rule in (b)(2)(C), the disclosed subject matter and the claimed invention count as commonly owned if: (1) the disclosed subject matter was developed, and the invention was made, by one or more parties to a joint research agreement that was already in effect by the invention's filing date; (2) the invention was made as a result of work covered by that joint research agreement; and (3) the patent application names the parties to that joint research agreement, or is amended to name them. (d) Patents and Published Applications Effective as Prior Art. To decide whether a patent or patent application counts as prior art to a claimed invention under (a)(2), the law treats that patent or application as "effectively filed" as of: (1) its actual filing date, if (2) does not apply; or (2) if the patent or application can claim an earlier priority date or filing-date benefit under listed sections (119, 365(a), 365(b), 386(a), 386(b), 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c)) based on one or more earlier-filed applications, the filing date of the earliest application that describes the same subject matter.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Novelty; Prior Art.—

A person shall be entitled to a patent unless—

(1)

the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention; or

(2)

the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.

(b)Exceptions.—
(1)Disclosures made 1 year or less before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.—

A disclosure made 1 year or less before the effective filing date of a claimed invention shall not be prior art to the claimed invention under subsection (a)(1) if—

(A)

the disclosure was made by the inventor or joint inventor or by another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; or

(B)

the subject matter disclosed had, before such disclosure, been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor.

(2)Disclosures appearing in applications and patents.—

A disclosure shall not be prior art to a claimed invention under subsection (a)(2) if—

(A)

the subject matter disclosed was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor;

(B)

the subject matter disclosed had, before such subject matter was effectively filed under subsection (a)(2), been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; or

(C)

the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, were owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person.

(c)Common Ownership Under Joint Research Agreements.—

Subject matter disclosed and a claimed invention shall be deemed to have been owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person in applying the provisions of subsection (b)(2)(C) if—

(1)

the subject matter disclosed was developed and the claimed invention was made by, or on behalf of, 1 or more parties to a joint research agreement that was in effect on or before the effective filing date of the claimed invention;

(2)

the claimed invention was made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of the joint research agreement; and

(3)

the application for patent for the claimed invention discloses or is amended to disclose the names of the parties to the joint research agreement.

(d)Patents and Published Applications Effective as Prior Art.—

For purposes of determining whether a patent or application for patent is prior art to a claimed invention under subsection (a)(2), such patent or application shall be considered to have been effectively filed, with respect to any subject matter described in the patent or application—

(1)

if paragraph (2) does not apply, as of the actual filing date of the patent or the application for patent; or

(2)

if the patent or application for patent is entitled to claim a right of priority under section 119, 365(a), 365(b), 386(a), or 386(b), or to claim the benefit of an earlier filing date under section 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c), based upon 1 or more prior filed applications for patent, as of the filing date of the earliest such application that describes the subject matter.

Source credit: (July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 797; Pub. L. 92–358, § 2, July 28, 1972, 86 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 94–131, § 5, Nov. 14, 1975, 89 Stat. 691; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §§ 4505, 4806], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–565, 1501A–590; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13205(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902; Pub. L. 112–29, § 3(b)(1), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 285; Pub. L. 112–211, title I, § 102(2), Dec. 18, 2012, 126 Stat. 1531.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1952Enacted · Act of July 19, 1952, ch. 950 · 66 Stat. 797
  • 1972Amended · Pub. L. 92-358 · 86 Stat. 502
  • 1975Amended · Pub. L. 94-131 · 89 Stat. 691
  • 1999Amended · Pub. L. 106-113 · 113 Stat. 1536, 1501
  • 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-273 · 116 Stat. 1902
  • 2011Amended · Pub. L. 112-29 · 125 Stat. 285
  • 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-211 · 126 Stat. 1531

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 950 on 1952-07-19.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case