42 U.S.C. § 16353 — Merit review of proposals
submitted 21 years ago by Pub. L. 109-58 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 131 words · no verdicts yet
The Department may award funds only after impartial scientific and technical review. Competitive awards must be open to qualified entities in the listed categories, and Congress expresses support for competition.
(a) Funds authorized under this Act or its amendments may be awarded only after the Department or someone acting for it has impartially reviewed the proposals’ scientific and technical merit. (b) A competitive award must use a competition open to all qualified entities in one or more of these categories: higher-education institutions; National Laboratories; nonprofit or for-profit private entities; State* or local governments; or consortia of entities in those categories. (c) Congress states that, as far as practicable, Department research, development, demonstration, and commercial-application activities should be awarded competitively.
Awards of funds authorized under this Act or an amendment made by this Act shall be made only after an impartial review of the scientific and technical merit of the proposals for the awards has been carried out by or for the Department.
Competitive awards under this Act shall involve competitions open to all qualified entities within one or more of the following categories:
Institutions of higher education.
National Laboratories.
Nonprofit and for-profit private entities.
State* and local governments.
Consortia of entities described in paragraphs (1) through (4).
It is the sense of Congress that research, development, demonstration, and commercial application activities carried out by the Department should be awarded using competitive procedures, to the maximum extent practicable.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, § 989, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 911.)
- 2005Enacted · Pub. L. 109-58 · 119 Stat. 911
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-58 on 2005-08-08.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case