ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 16376 — State and local permits

submitted 5 years ago by Pub. L. 109-58 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 90 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Getting CIFIA help doesn't excuse a project from state or local permit rules. It doesn't limit a state or local government's power to regulate investors' profits. It also doesn't override any other state or local law.

Getting a federal credit instrument or grant under the CIFIA program for a project does not:

  1. Relieve the recipient of the project's obligation to get any state or local permit or approval the project still needs.
  1. Limit any state or local government's right to approve or regulate the rate of return that private investors earn on money invested in the project.
  1. Otherwise override any state or local law (including any regulation) that applies to building or running the project.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The provision of credit assistance under the CIFIA program with respect to a project shall not—

(1)

relieve any recipient of the assistance of any project obligation to obtain any required State or local permit or approval with respect to the project;

(2)

limit the right of any unit of State or local government to approve or regulate any rate of return on private equity invested in the project; or

(3)

otherwise supersede any State or local law (including any regulation) applicable to the construction or operation of the project.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, § 999F, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title III, § 40304(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 999.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2021Enacted · Pub. L. 109-58 · 135 Stat. 999

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-58 on 2021-11-15.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case