ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 19191Findings

submitted 4 years ago by Pub. L. 117-167 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 265 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress lists facts showing sexual harassment is a widespread problem in academic science. It notes harassment drives away trained scientists and that federal agencies don't share reports well, letting harassers get new funding elsewhere.

Congress states these findings. (1) A 2018 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, called "Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine," found: (A) Sexual harassment happens throughout colleges and universities. (B) The most common kind is "gender harassment" — that means put-downs, insults, or hostile treatment based on someone's sex. (C) 58 percent of people working in academic science experience sexual harassment. That is the second-highest rate compared to the military, private companies, and federal, state, and local government. (D) Women who belong to racial or ethnic minority groups are more likely to be sexually harassed, and to feel unsafe at work, than White women, White men, or men from minority groups. (E) Training one person to a Ph.D. in a STEM field (science, technology, engineering, or math) costs about $500,000. (F) When a trained person leaves the field because of harassment, that talent and money are lost. (2) A 2017 University of Illinois study found that among astronomers and planetary scientists, 18 percent of women from racial or ethnic minority groups, and 12 percent of White women, skipped professional events because they didn't feel safe going. (3) Federal research agencies don't handle harassment reports the same way. Some are easier to access than others. (4) Federal research agencies don't communicate well with each other, or with the schools and organizations that get their money, about harassment reports. Because of this, people who harass others can move to a new institution and still get federal funding.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Congress makes the following findings:

(1)

According to the report issued by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in 2018 entitled “Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine”—

(A)

sexual harassment is pervasive in institutions of higher education;

(B)

the most common type of sexual harassment is gender harassment;

(C)

58 percent of individuals in the academic workplace experience sexual harassment, the second highest rate when compared to the military, the private sector, and Federal, State, and local government;

(D)

women who are members of racial or ethnic minority groups are more likely to experience sexual harassment and to feel unsafe at work than White women, White men, or men who are members of such groups;

(E)

the training for each individual who has a Doctor of Philosophy in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields is estimated to cost approximately $500,000; and

(F)

attrition of an individual so trained results in a loss of talent and money.

(2)

According to a 2017 University of Illinois study, among astronomers and planetary scientists, 18 percent of women who are members of racial or ethnic minority groups and 12 percent of White women skipped professional events because they did not feel safe attending.

(3)

Reporting procedures with respect to sexual harassment are inconsistent among Federal research agencies and have varying degrees of accessibility.

(4)

There is not adequate communication among Federal research agencies and between such agencies and recipients regarding reports of sexual harassment, which has resulted in harassers receiving Federal funding after moving to a different institution.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title V, § 10531, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1627.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2022Enacted · Pub. L. 117-167 · 136 Stat. 1627

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 117-167 on 2022-08-09.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case