42 U.S.C. § 2000bb–4 — Establishment clause unaffected
submitted 33 years ago by Pub. L. 103-141 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 87 words · no verdicts yet
This section addresses Establishment clause unaffected. Nothing in this chapter must be construed to affect, interpret, or in any way address that portion of the First Amendment prohibiting laws respecting the establishment of religion (referred to in this section as the “Establishment Clause”). Granting government funding, benefits, or exemptions, to the extent permissible under the Establishment Clause, must not constitute a violation of this chapter.
Nothing in this chapter must be construed to affect, interpret, or in any way address that portion of the First Amendment prohibiting laws respecting the establishment of religion (referred to in this section as the “Establishment Clause”). Granting government* funding, benefits, or exemptions, to the extent permissible under the Establishment Clause, must not constitute a violation of this chapter. As used in this section, the term “granting”, used about government funding, benefits, or exemptions, does not include the denial of government funding, benefits, or exemptions.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to affect, interpret, or in any way address that portion of the First Amendment prohibiting laws respecting the establishment of religion (referred to in this section as the “Establishment Clause”). Granting government* funding, benefits, or exemptions, to the extent permissible under the Establishment Clause, shall not constitute a violation of this chapter. As used in this section, the term “granting”, used with respect to government funding, benefits, or exemptions, does not include the denial of government funding, benefits, or exemptions.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–141, § 7, Nov. 16, 1993, 107 Stat. 1489.)
- 1993Enacted · Pub. L. 103-141 · 107 Stat. 1489
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-141 on 1993-11-16.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case