ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 2000h–4Construction of provisions not to exclude operation of State laws and not to invalidate consistent State laws

submitted 62 years ago by Pub. L. 88-352 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 74 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress did not intend any title of this Act to occupy the field and exclude State laws on the same subject. State laws remain valid unless inconsistent with this Act’s purposes or provisions.

Nothing in a title of this Act shows an intent for Congress to occupy the field so completely that State laws on the same subject are excluded. No provision of this Act invalidates a State-law provision unless it conflicts with a purpose or provision of this Act.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Nothing contained in any title of this Act shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to occupy the field in which any such title operates to the exclusion of State laws on the same subject matter, nor shall any provision of this Act be construed as invalidating any provision of State law unless such provision is inconsistent with any of the purposes of this Act, or any provision thereof.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 88–352, title XI, § 1104, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 268.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1964Enacted · Pub. L. 88-352 · 78 Stat. 268

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 88-352 on 1964-07-02.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case