ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 4023 — Properties in violation of State and local law

submitted 58 years ago by Pub. L. 90-448 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 62 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Administrator may not provide new flood insurance for property that an authorized State or local body has declared violates land-use laws or rules meant to restrict development or occupancy in flood-prone areas.

No new flood insurance coverage must be provided under this chapter for any property which the Administrator finds has been declared by a duly constituted State or local zoning authority, or other authorized public body, to be in violation of State or local laws, regulations, or ordinances which are intended to discourage or otherwise restrict land development or occupancy in flood-prone areas.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

No new flood insurance coverage shall be provided under this chapter for any property which the Administrator finds has been declared by a duly constituted State or local zoning authority, or other authorized public body, to be in violation of State or local laws, regulations, or ordinances which are intended to discourage or otherwise restrict land development or occupancy in flood-prone areas.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 90–448, title XIII, § 1316, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 580; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, § 451(d)(1)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1229; Pub. L. 112–141, div. F, title II, § 100238(b)(1), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 958.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1968Enacted · Pub. L. 90-448 · 82 Stat. 580
  • 1983Amended · Pub. L. 98-181 · 97 Stat. 1229
  • 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-141 · 126 Stat. 958

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 90-448 on 1968-08-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case