ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 284nCertain demonstration projects

submitted 19 years ago by Pub. L. 109-482 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 655 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

NIH's Director may fund two kinds of demonstration research projects. "Bridging the sciences" grants combine biology with physical and computational sciences, aiming for innovative, higher-risk, long-term-payoff work. "High-risk, high-reward" grants fund cutting-edge research that boosts basic biological understanding. Both need peer review, and by the end of fiscal year 2009 the Secretary had to report their results to Congress.

(a) Bridging the sciences. (1) Using money appropriated under section 282a(b), the Secretary — through the NIH Director, working with the National Science Foundation, Energy Department, and other agencies as needed — may fund grants at national research institutes and centers for demonstration projects at the border between biology, behavior, and social science, and the physical, chemical, math, and computer sciences. (2) The Secretary must set goals, priorities, and evaluation methods for this research, and coordinate across agencies, making sure the research is innovative and higher-risk with long-term payoffs, and spans a wide range of projects at different funding levels and timeframes. (3) A grant can only be made if the application has gone through technical and scientific peer review under section 289a, and has been reviewed by the advisory council under section 282(k) or by another qualified advisory council. (b) High-risk, high-reward research. (1) Using the same appropriated money, the Secretary — through the NIH Director — may fund grants, contracts, or other transactions for high-impact, cutting-edge research that boosts basic biological understanding toward preventing, diagnosing, and treating diseases. An institute or center head may run this research directly, if they first notify the Director and report annually on it. (2) The Director must give special attention to coordinating with institutes whose budgets are large relative to others. (3) This research must be designed to move with maximum flexibility and speed. (4) The Director (or institute/center head) must try to build public-private partnerships, coordinating with the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health when appropriate. (5) A grant can only be made after the same peer-review and advisory-council process described in subsection (a)(3). (c) Report to Congress. By the end of fiscal year 2009, the Secretary — through the NIH Director — had to evaluate this section's activities and report the results to Congress. (d) Definitions. "Director of NIH," "national research institute," and "national center" have the same meanings given in section 281.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Bridging the sciences
(1) In general

From amounts to be appropriated under section 282a(b) of this title, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of NIH, (in this subsection referred to as the “Secretary”) in consultation with the Director of the National Science Foundation, the Secretary of Energy, and other agency heads when necessary, may allocate funds for the national research institutes and national centers to make grants for the purpose of improving the public health through demonstration projects for biomedical research at the interface between the biological, behavioral, and social sciences and the physical, chemical, mathematical, and computational sciences.

(2) Goals, priorities, and methods; interagency collaboration

The Secretary shall establish goals, priorities, and methods of evaluation for research under paragraph (1), and shall provide for interagency collaboration with respect to such research. In developing such goals, priorities, and methods, the Secretary shall ensure that—

(A)

the research reflects the vision of innovation and higher risk with long-term payoffs; and

(B)

the research includes a wide spectrum of projects, funded at various levels, with varying timeframes.

(3) Peer review

A grant may be made under paragraph (1) only if the application for the grant has undergone technical and scientific peer review under section 289a of this title and has been reviewed by the advisory council under section 282(k) of this title or has been reviewed by an advisory council composed of representatives from appropriate scientific disciplines who can fully evaluate the applicant.

(b) High-risk, high-reward research
(1) In general

From amounts to be appropriated under section 282a(b) of this title, the Secretary, acting through the Director of NIH, may allocate funds for the national research institutes and national centers to make awards of grants or contracts or to engage in other transactions for demonstration projects for high-impact, cutting-edge research that fosters scientific creativity and increases fundamental biological understanding leading to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and disorders. The head of a national research institute or national center may conduct or support such high-impact, cutting-edge research (with funds allocated under the preceding sentence or otherwise available for such purpose) if the institute or center gives notice to the Director of NIH beforehand and submits a report to the Director of NIH on an annual basis on the activities of the institute or center relating to such research.

(2) Special consideration

In carrying out the program under paragraph (1), the Director of NIH shall give special consideration to coordinating activities with national research institutes whose budgets are substantial relative to a majority of the other institutes.

(3) Administration of program

Activities relating to research described in paragraph (1) shall be designed by the Director of NIH or the head of a national research institute or national center, as applicable, to enable such research to be carried out with maximum flexibility and speed.

(4) Public-private partnerships

In providing for research described in paragraph (1), the Director of NIH or the head of a national research institute or national center, as applicable, shall seek to facilitate partnerships between public and private entities and shall coordinate when appropriate with the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health.

(5) Peer review

A grant for research described in paragraph (1) may be made only if the application for the grant has undergone technical and scientific peer review under section 289a of this title and has been reviewed by the advisory council under section 282(k) of this title.

(c) Report to Congress

Not later than the end of fiscal year 2009, the Secretary, acting through the Director of NIH, shall conduct an evaluation of the activities under this section and submit a report to the Congress on the results of such evaluation.

(d) Definitions

For purposes of this section, the terms “Director of NIH”, “national research institute”, and “national center” have the meanings given such terms in section 281 of this title.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 109–482, title I, § 105, Jan. 15, 2007, 120 Stat. 3694.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2007Enacted · Pub. L. 109-482 · 120 Stat. 3694

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-482 on 2007-01-15.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case