ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 285c–7Biennial report

submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 99-158 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 85 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Institute's Director must describe certain activities in a biennial report. The report covers work under the diabetes plan and the digestive diseases plan. It must also evaluate the research centers funded under section 285c–5.

The Director of the Institute must include a description of the Institute's activities in the biennial report required under section 284b. That description must cover: (1) work done under the current diabetes plan, made under the National Diabetes Mellitus Research and Education Act; and (2) work done under the current digestive diseases plan, made under the Arthritis, Diabetes, and Digestive Diseases Amendments of 1976. The Director's description must also evaluate the activities of the research centers supported under section 285c–5.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The Director of the Institute shall prepare for inclusion in the biennial report made under section 284b 1 of this title a description of the Institute’s activities—

(1)

under the current diabetes plan under the National Diabetes Mellitus Research and Education Act; and

(2)

under the current digestive diseases plan formulated under the Arthritis, Diabetes, and Digestive Diseases Amendments of 1976.

The description submitted by the Director shall include an evaluation of the activities of the centers supported under section 285c–5 of this title.

Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, § 433, as added Pub. L. 99–158, § 2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 848.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 99-158 · 99 Stat. 848

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 99-158 on 1944-07-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case