ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 300j–18Drinking water studies

submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 104-182 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 740 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The EPA must study which groups face higher health risks from contaminated drinking water. It must also research how chemicals affect the body and study harmful substances in drinking water rules. The CDC and EPA must also run pilot waterborne disease studies and educate providers and the public.

(a) Subpopulations at greater risk. The EPA must keep studying which groups in the population face bigger health risks from contaminants in drinking water than the general public does. The studies must look at whether babies, children, pregnant women, older people, people with a history of serious illness, or other identifiable groups face higher risks — including cancer risk — from drinking water contaminants. By 4 years after August 6, 1996, and again whenever important new information comes up, the EPA must report the results to Congress. (b) Biological mechanisms. The EPA must run biomedical studies to: understand how the body absorbs, spreads, processes, and gets rid of chemical contaminants, so it can build better models of how this works; understand how contaminants cause harm — especially non-cancer and infectious harm — and how those effects vary between people (especially higher-risk groups) and between test animals and humans; and develop new ways to study complex mixtures of chemicals and microbes, like the mixtures found in drinking water, including whether chemicals interact to make effects stronger or weaker, and including effects on vulnerable people and non-cancer, infectious illnesses. (c) Studies on harmful substances in drinking water. Within 180 days of August 6, 1996, after talking with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Agriculture, and other relevant agencies, the EPA had to start studies to support three specific rules: the Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, the Disinfectant and Disinfection Byproducts Rule, and the Ground Water Disinfection Rule. These studies must at least include: toxicology studies (and health studies on real populations, if needed) on what exposure levels to disinfectants and their byproducts might cause birth defects or other toxic harm; similar studies to measure the cancer risk from different disinfectants' byproducts; and research building dose-response curves — meaning how much exposure to pathogens like cryptosporidium and the Norwalk virus causes what level of harm. Congress could spend $12,500,000 a year on this work for fiscal years 1997 through 2003. (d) Waterborne disease occurrence study. Within 2 years of August 6, 1996, the CDC Director and the EPA Administrator had to jointly run pilot studies on waterborne disease in at least 5 major U.S. communities or water systems. Within 5 years, they had to report the pilot studies' findings and give a national estimate of how much waterborne disease occurs. They also had to jointly create a national campaign to train health care providers and educate the public about waterborne disease and its symptoms, gathering input from scientists, doctors, governments, environmental groups, water systems, and vulnerable populations. Congress could spend $3,000,000 a year on this for fiscal years 1997 through 2001. If that money fell short, the EPA could use up to $2,000,000 from health-effects-study funds reserved under section 300j–12(n) for this same purpose, and could pass some of it to the CDC.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Subpopulations at greater risk
(1) In general

The Administrator shall conduct a continuing program of studies to identify groups within the general population that may be at greater risk than the general population of adverse health effects from exposure to contaminants in drinking water. The study shall examine whether and to what degree infants, children, pregnant women, the elderly, individuals with a history of serious illness, or other subpopulations that can be identified and characterized are likely to experience elevated health risks, including risks of cancer, from contaminants in drinking water.

(2) Report

Not later than 4 years after August 6, 1996, and periodically thereafter as new and significant information becomes available, the Administrator shall report to the Congress on the results of the studies.

(b) Biological mechanisms

The Administrator shall conduct biomedical studies to—

(1)

understand the mechanisms by which chemical contaminants are absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and eliminated from the human body, so as to develop more accurate physiologically based models of the phenomena;

(2)

understand the effects of contaminants and the mechanisms by which the contaminants cause adverse effects (especially noncancer and infectious effects) and the variations in the effects among humans, especially subpopulations at greater risk of adverse effects, and between test animals and humans; and

(3)

develop new approaches to the study of complex mixtures, such as mixtures found in drinking water, especially to determine the prospects for synergistic or antagonistic interactions that may affect the shape of the dose-response relationship of the individual chemicals and microbes, and to examine noncancer endpoints and infectious diseases, and susceptible individuals and subpopulations.

(c) Studies on harmful substances in drinking water
(1) Development of studies

The Administrator shall, not later than 180 days after August 6, 1996, and after consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Agriculture, and, as appropriate, the heads of other Federal agencies, conduct the studies described in paragraph (2) to support the development and implementation of the most current version of each of the following:

(A)

Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (59 Fed. Reg. 38832 (July 29, 1994)).

(B)

Disinfectant and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (59 Fed. Reg. 38668 (July 29, 1994)).

(C)

Ground Water Disinfection Rule (availability of draft summary announced at (57 Fed. Reg. 33960; July 31, 1992)).

(2) Contents of studies

The studies required by paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, each of the following:

(A)

Toxicological studies and, if warranted, epidemiological studies to determine what levels of exposure from disinfectants and disinfection byproducts, if any, may be associated with developmental and birth defects and other potential toxic end points.

(B)

Toxicological studies and, if warranted, epidemiological studies to quantify the carcinogenic potential from exposure to disinfection byproducts resulting from different disinfectants.

(C)

The development of dose-response curves for pathogens, including cryptosporidium and the Norwalk virus.

(3) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 1997 through 2003.

(d) Waterborne disease occurrence study
(1) System

The Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Administrator shall jointly—

(A)

within 2 years after August 6, 1996, conduct pilot waterborne disease occurrence studies for at least 5 major United States communities or public water systems; and

(B)

within 5 years after August 6, 1996, prepare a report on the findings of the pilot studies, and a national estimate of waterborne disease occurrence.

(2) Training and education

The Director and Administrator shall jointly establish a national health care provider training and public education campaign to inform both the professional health care provider community and the general public about waterborne disease and the symptoms that may be caused by infectious agents, including microbial contaminants. In developing such a campaign, they shall seek comment from interested groups and individuals, including scientists, physicians, State and local governments, environmental groups, public water systems, and vulnerable populations.

(3) Funding

There are authorized to be appropriated for each of the fiscal years 1997 through 2001, $3,000,000 to carry out this subsection. To the extent funds under this subsection are not fully appropriated, the Administrator may use not more than $2,000,000 of the funds from amounts reserved under section 300j–12(n) of this title for health effects studies for purposes of this subsection. The Administrator may transfer a portion of such funds to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for such purposes.

Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIV, § 1458, as added Pub. L. 104–182, title I, § 137, Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1680.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 104-182 · 110 Stat. 1680

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 104-182 on 1944-07-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case