ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 6374dStudies and reports

submitted 38 years ago by Pub. L. 94-163 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 184 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Methanol study
(1)

The Secretary shall study methanol plants, including the costs and practicability of such plants, that are—

(A)

capable of utilizing current domestic supplies of unutilized natural gas;

(B)

relocatable; or

(C)

suitable for natural gas to methanol conversion by natural gas distribution companies.

(2)

For purposes of this subsection, the term “unutilized natural gas” means gas that is available in small remote fields and cannot be economically transported to natural gas pipelines, or gas the quality of which is so poor that extensive and uneconomic pretreatment is required prior to its introduction into the natural gas distribution system.

(3)

The Secretary shall submit a report under this subsection to the Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, no later than September 30, 1990.

(b) Omitted

(c) Public participation

Adequate opportunity shall be provided for public comment on the reports required by this section before they are submitted to the Congress, and a summary of such comments shall be attached to such reports.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 94–163, title III, § 400EE, as added Pub. L. 100–494, § 4(a), Oct. 14, 1988, 102 Stat. 2447.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1988Enacted · Pub. L. 94-163 · 102 Stat. 2447

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 94-163 on 1988-10-14.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case