ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 7608Mandatory licensing

submitted 71 years ago by Pub. L. 91-604 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 179 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A patent right may sometimes block someone from complying with certain Clean Air Act rules. If there is no other way to comply, the Attorney General may ask a court to step in. That requires proof the patent's unavailability would hurt competition, and lets the court order a reasonable license.

The Attorney General can act only after the Administrator applies for it, and only if two findings are made. First, under paragraph (1), the Attorney General must find: (A) that a U.S. patent right is being used or is meant for public or commercial use, is not otherwise reasonably available, and is necessary for someone to comply with limitations set under section 7411, 7412, or 7521 of this title; and (B) that there is no reasonable alternative way to meet that requirement. Second, under paragraph (2), the Attorney General must also find that not having access to the patent right could substantially lessen competition, or tend to create a monopoly, in some line of commerce somewhere in the country. If both findings are made, the Attorney General can certify this to a U.S. district court. The court, after a hearing, can order the patent's owner to license it to the person who needs it, on terms and conditions the court decides are reasonable. This certification must go to the district court for the district where the patent owner lives, does business, or is found.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Whenever the Attorney General determines, upon application of the Administrator

(1)

that—

(A)

in the implementation of the requirements of section 7411, 7412, or 7521 of this title, a right under any United States letters patent, which is being used or intended for public or commercial use and not otherwise reasonably available, is necessary to enable any person required to comply with such limitation to so comply, and

(B)

there are no reasonable alternative methods to accomplish such purpose, and

(2)

that the unavailability of such right may result in a substantial lessening of competition or tendency to create a monopoly in any line of commerce in any section of the country,

the Attorney General may so certify to a district court of the United States, which may issue an order requiring the person who owns such patent to license it on such reasonable terms and conditions as the court, after hearing, may determine. Such certification may be made to the district court for the district in which the person owning the patent resides, does business, or is found.

Source credit: (July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, § 308, as added Pub. L. 91–604, § 12(a), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1708.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1955Enacted · Pub. L. 91-604 · 84 Stat. 1708

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 91-604 on 1955-07-14.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case