42 U.S.C. § 7705b — Seismic standards
submitted 36 years ago by Pub. L. 95-124 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 183 words · no verdicts yet
NIST and FEMA had to convene an expert committee on earthquake-resistant buildings by December 2019. The committee studied how to speed up post-earthquake recovery. It reported its recommendations to Congress by June 2020.
Not later than December 1, 2019, the Director* of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Administrator* of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall jointly convene a committee of experts from Federal agencies, nongovernmental organizations, private sector entities, disaster management professional associations, engineering professional associations, and professional construction and homebuilding industry associations, to assess and recommend options for improving the built environment and critical infrastructure to reflect performance goals stated in terms of post-earthquake reoccupancy and functional recovery time.
Not later than June 30, 2020, the committee convened under paragraph (1) shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee on Natural Resources, and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives a report on recommended options for improving the built environment and critical infrastructure to reflect performance goals stated in terms of post-earthquake reoccupancy and functional recovery time.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 95–124, § 8, as added Pub. L. 101–614, § 8(a), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3237; amended Pub. L. 115–307, § 5, Dec. 11, 2018, 132 Stat. 4415.)
- 1990Enacted · Pub. L. 95-124 · 104 Stat. 3237
- 2018Amended · Pub. L. 115-307 · 132 Stat. 4415
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-124 on 1990-11-16.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case