ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

45 U.S.C. § 1109 — Effectuation of cost reductions

submitted 45 years ago by Pub. L. 97-35 to r/title-45-RAILROADS · 73 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Cost reductions under this subtitle may not be used to cap Conrail’s rates, limit lawful rate increases, or limit a lawful surcharge or cancellation under chapter 107 of title 49.

Cost reductions resulting from this subtitle or its amendments may not be used to limit the highest rate Conrail may charge for rail service, limit an increase in such a rate (including a joint rate), or limit a surcharge or cancellation that is otherwise lawful under chapter 107 of title 49.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Any cost reductions resulting from the provisions of or the amendments made by this subtitle shall not be used to limit the maximum level of any rate charged by Conrail for the provision of rail service, to limit the amount of any increase in any such rate (including rates maintained jointly by Conrail and other rail carriers), or to limit a surcharge or cancellation otherwise lawful under chapter 107 1 of title 49.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, § 1159, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 682.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1981Enacted · Pub. L. 97-35 · 95 Stat. 682

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 97-35 on 1981-08-13.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case