ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

46 U.S.C. § 2115 — Civil penalty to enforce alcohol and dangerous drug testing

submitted 30 years ago by Pub. L. 104-324 to r/title-46-SHIPPING · 83 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section concerns Civil penalty to enforce alcohol and dangerous drug testing. It states the rules and limits in the provisions below.

Any person who fails to implement or conduct, or who otherwise fails to comply with the requirements prescribed by the Secretary for, chemical testing for dangerous drugs or for evidence of alcohol use, as prescribed under this subtitle or a regulation prescribed by the Secretary to carry out the provisions of this subtitle, is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of no more than $5,000 for each violation. Each day of a continuing violation must constitute a separate violation.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Any person who fails to implement or conduct, or who otherwise fails to comply with the requirements prescribed by the Secretary for, chemical testing for dangerous drugs or for evidence of alcohol use, as prescribed under this subtitle or a regulation prescribed by the Secretary to carry out the provisions of this subtitle, is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each violation. Each day of a continuing violation shall constitute a separate violation.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 104–324, title III, § 303(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3917; amended Pub. L. 105–383, title III, § 304(b), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3419.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1996Enacted · Pub. L. 104-324 · 110 Stat. 3917
  • 1998Amended · Pub. L. 105-383 · 112 Stat. 3419

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 104-324 on 1996-10-19.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case