ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

47 U.S.C. § 765g — Exclusivity arrangements

submitted 26 years ago by Pub. L. 87-624 to r/title-47-TELECOMMUNICATIONS · 126 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A satellite operator may not obtain an exclusive right to handle telecommunications between the United States and another country or territory through an agreement or similar arrangement. Existing contracted or tariff-committed services are protected, while certain new services may be ended.

(a) A satellite operator may not obtain or use an exclusive right to handle telecommunications to or from the United States, its territories or possessions, and another country or territory because of a concession, contract, understanding, or working arrangement involving the operator or a person or company controlling or controlled by the operator.

(b) When enforcing this section, the Commission:

(1) must not require existing satellite telecommunications services to end if they are under contract with, or covered by a tariff commitment to, the operator; but

(2) may require new services to end only for the country that granted the exclusive handling right, if the Commission decides that the public interest, convenience, and necessity require it.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

No satellite operator shall acquire or enjoy the exclusive right of handling telecommunications to or from the United States, its territories or possessions, and any other country or territory by reason of any concession, contract, understanding, or working arrangement to which the satellite operator or any persons or companies controlling or controlled by the operator are parties.

(b) Exception

In enforcing the provisions of this section, the Commission—

(1)

shall not require the termination of existing satellite telecommunications services under contract with, or tariff commitment to, such satellite operator; but

(2)

may require the termination of new services only to the country that has provided the exclusive right to handle telecommunications, if the Commission determines the public interest, convenience, and necessity so requires.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 87–624, title VI, § 648, as added Pub. L. 106–180, § 3, Mar. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 57.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2000Enacted · Pub. L. 87-624 · 114 Stat. 57

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 87-624 on 2000-03-17.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case