ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 20106Preemption

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-272 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 350 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Railroad safety and security rules should be uniform nationwide. States can keep stricter local rules if they meet specific conditions. This section doesn't block state-law injury lawsuits over failed safety standards.

(a) National Uniformity of Regulation. (1) Laws, regulations, and orders about railroad safety, and laws, regulations, and orders about railroad security, must be nationally uniform as much as practical. (2) A state can adopt or keep a law, regulation, or order about railroad safety or security until the Secretary of Transportation (for safety matters) or the Secretary of Homeland Security (for security matters) prescribes a regulation or issues an order covering the same subject. Even then, a state can adopt or keep an additional or stricter law, regulation, or order about railroad safety or security if it: (A) is needed to eliminate or reduce a hazard that is essentially local; (B) isn't incompatible with a federal law, regulation, or order; and (C) doesn't unreasonably burden interstate commerce. (b) Clarification Regarding State Law Causes of Action. (1) Nothing in this section blocks a state-law lawsuit seeking damages for personal injury, death, or property damage that claims a party: (A) failed to meet the federal standard of care set by a regulation or order the Secretary of Transportation or Secretary of Homeland Security issued covering the subject matter, as provided in subsection (a); (B) failed to follow its own plan, rule, or standard that it created under a regulation or order from either Secretary; or (C) failed to follow a state law, regulation, or order that isn't incompatible with subsection (a)(2). (2) This subsection applies to all pending state-law lawsuits arising from events or activities happening on or after January 18, 2002. (c) Jurisdiction. Nothing in this section creates a federal cause of action for an injured party, or gives federal courts jurisdiction over these state-law claims.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)National Uniformity of Regulation.—
(1)

Laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad safety and laws, regulations, and orders related to railroad security shall be nationally uniform to the extent practicable.

(2)

A State may adopt or continue in force a law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security until the Secretary of Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters), prescribes a regulation or issues an order covering the subject matter of the State requirement. A State may adopt or continue in force an additional or more stringent law, regulation, or order related to railroad safety or security when the law, regulation, or order—

(A)

is necessary to eliminate or reduce an essentially local safety or security hazard;

(B)

is not incompatible with a law, regulation, or order of the United States Government; and

(C)

does not unreasonably burden interstate commerce.

(b)Clarification Regarding State Law Causes of Action.—
(1)

Nothing in this section shall be construed to preempt an action under State law seeking damages for personal injury, death, or property damage alleging that a party—

(A)

has failed to comply with the Federal standard of care established by a regulation or order issued by the Secretary of Transportation (with respect to railroad safety matters), or the Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to railroad security matters), covering the subject matter as provided in subsection (a) of this section;

(B)

has failed to comply with its own plan, rule, or standard that it created pursuant to a regulation or order issued by either of the Secretaries; or

(C)

has failed to comply with a State law, regulation, or order that is not incompatible with subsection (a)(2).

(2)

This subsection shall apply to all pending State law causes of action arising from events or activities occurring on or after January 18, 2002.

(c)Jurisdiction.—

Nothing in this section creates a Federal cause of action on behalf of an injured party or confers Federal question jurisdiction for such State law causes of action.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 866; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, § 1710(c), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2319; Pub. L. 110–53, title XV, § 1528, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 453.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-272 · 108 Stat. 866
  • 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-296 · 116 Stat. 2319
  • 2007Amended · Pub. L. 110-53 · 121 Stat. 453

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-272 on 1994-07-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case