ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 20110Effect on employee qualifications and collective bargaining

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-272 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 75 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary can only regulate employee qualifications tied to railroad safety. Unions and railroads can still bargain over other qualifications under the Railway Labor Act. Those agreements just can't conflict with safety rules and orders.

This chapter doesn't: (1) let the Secretary of Transportation prescribe regulations or issue orders about employee qualifications, except qualifications specifically tied to safety; or (2) stop the bargaining representatives of railroad carriers and their employees from making collective bargaining agreements under the Railway Labor Act — including agreements about employee qualifications — as long as those agreements aren't inconsistent with regulations prescribed and orders issued under this chapter.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

This chapter does not—

(1)

authorize the Secretary of Transportation to prescribe regulations and issue orders related to qualifications of employees, except qualifications specifically related to safety; or

(2)

prohibit the bargaining representatives of railroad carriers and their employees from making collective bargaining agreements under the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.), including agreements related to qualifications of employees, that are not inconsistent with regulations prescribed and orders issued under this chapter.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 868.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-272 · 108 Stat. 868

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-272 on 1994-07-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case