ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 47106Project grant application approval conditioned on satisfaction of project requirements

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-272 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 1,498 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of Transportation can only approve airport grants that meet several conditions. Conditions cover community planning fit, funding, environmental review, and airport master plans. Rules also cover new hub airport reports, gate-competition plans, and evacuation planning.

(a) Project Grant Application Approval — The Secretary may approve a project grant application only if satisfied that (1) the project fits the existing plans of public agencies the state has authorized to plan development around the airport; (2) the project helps carry out this subchapter; (3) there is enough money to cover project costs the federal government will not pay; (4) the project will finish without unreasonable delay; (5) the sponsor has the authority to carry out the project; (6) if the airport has a master plan that includes the project, that master plan addresses solid-waste recycling — covering (A) whether recycling is feasible, (B) minimizing solid waste, (C) operation and maintenance needs, (D) reviewing waste-management contracts, and (E) potential cost savings or revenue; and (7) if the airport is listed as having "unclassified" status in the current national plan, the project is funded under section 47114(d)(2)(B) and is either (A) maintenance of the primary runway's pavement, (B) obstruction removal for the primary runway, (C) rehabilitation of the primary runway, or (D) something the Secretary considers necessary for the airport's safe operation. (b) Airport Development Project Grant Application Approval — For an airport development grant, the Secretary must also be satisfied that (1) the sponsor, a public agency, or the government holds — or will get — good title to the areas used for aircraft landing, takeoff, or ground movement; (2) the interests of nearby communities have been fairly considered; and (3) the application includes touchdown-zone and centerline runway lighting, high-intensity runway lighting, or land for approach light systems, if the Secretary decides — based on the airport's category and its traffic — this is needed for safe, efficient use. (c) Environmental Requirements — (1) For a project involving the location of an airport or runway, or a major runway extension, the Secretary may approve it only if (A) the sponsor certifies that (i) the public had a chance for a hearing on the economic, social, and environmental effects, and how the location fits any community planning; (ii) the airport's management board either has voting representation from the affected communities, or has told them they can petition the Secretary; and (iii) for a project at a medium or large hub airport, the sponsor has made available — and provided on request — a copy of the proposed layout-plan amendment and any master plan describing the project, to the area's metropolitan planning organization, if there is one; and (B) if the project would significantly harm natural resources, fish and wildlife, scenic or recreational assets, water or air quality, or another environmental factor, the Secretary may approve it only after finding no possible, sensible alternative exists and every reasonable step has been taken to reduce the harm. (2) For a project not involving the location of an airport, runway, or major extension at an existing airport, the Secretary need not require a noise-related environmental impact statement if (A) the project would let aircraft meeting the "stage 3" noise standards (a specific FAA rule) replace aircraft that don't meet them, and (B) the project meets the other requirements of this subchapter. (3) The sponsor must give the Secretary a copy of any hearing transcript from paragraph (1)(A) if asked. (4) The Secretary may only make the finding in paragraph (1)(B) after completely reviewing the matter, and that review and finding must be a matter of public record. (d) Withholding Approval — (1) The Secretary may withhold approval of money apportioned under section 47114(c) and (e) for violating an assurance or requirement of this subchapter, but only if (A) the sponsor is given a chance for a hearing, and (B) the Secretary finds a violation occurred within 180 days of the later of the application date or the date the Secretary discovers the noncompliance. (2) That 180-day period may be extended by (A) agreement between the Secretary and sponsor, or (B) the hearing officer, if the sponsor did not follow the officer's schedule. (3) Anyone adversely affected by a withholding order may seek review by filing a petition in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, or the circuit where the project is located, within 60 days of the order being served. (e) Reports Relating to Construction of Certain New Hub Airports — At least 90 days before approving a grant application to build a new hub airport expected to have 0.25 percent or more of total annual U.S. passenger boardings, the Secretary must submit a report to Congress analyzing the expected impact of the new airport on (1) the fees, including landing fees, and other costs air carriers will face using it; (2) air transportation that will be provided in that region; and (3) the availability and cost of air transportation to rural areas in that region. (f) Competition Plans — (1) Prohibition: Starting in fiscal year 2001, no passenger facility charge may be approved under section 40117, and no grant may be made under this subchapter, for a "covered airport" unless it has submitted a written competition plan under this subsection. (2) Contents: The plan must cover the availability of gates and related facilities, leasing and sub-leasing arrangements, gate-use requirements, gate-assignment policy, financial constraints, airport control over air- and ground-side capacity, and whether the airport intends to build or acquire common-use gates. (3) Special rule for fiscal year 2002: This subsection does not apply to a passenger facility fee or grant made in fiscal year 2002, if it is used to improve security at a covered airport. (4) Covered airport defined: a commercial service airport that (A) has more than 0.25 percent of total annual passenger boardings at all such airports, and (B) where one or two air carriers control more than 50 percent of the passenger boardings. (g) Consultation With Secretary of Homeland Security — Before approving a grant for the security-equipment activities described in section 47102(3)(B)(ii), or the bulk-explosive-detection installation activities described in section 47102(3)(B)(x), the Secretary must consult the Secretary of Homeland Security — but only as those activities relate to security equipment or bulk explosive detection, respectively. (h) Evaluation of Airport Master Plans — When evaluating an airport's master plan for purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary must take into account (1) the airport's role with respect to medical emergencies and evacuations, and (2) its role in emergency or disaster preparedness in the community it serves.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Project Grant Application Approval.—

The Secretary of Transportation may approve an application under this subchapter for a project grant only if the Secretary is satisfied that—

(1)

the project is consistent with plans (existing at the time the project is approved) of public agencies authorized by the State in which the airport is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport;

(2)

the project will contribute to carrying out this subchapter;

(3)

enough money is available to pay the project costs that will not be paid by the United States Government under this subchapter;

(4)

the project will be completed without unreasonable delay;

(5)

the sponsor has authority to carry out the project as proposed;

(6)

if the project is for an airport that has an airport master plan that includes the project, the master plan addresses issues relating to solid waste recycling at the airport, including—

(A)

the feasibility of solid waste recycling at the airport;

(B)

minimizing the generation of solid waste at the airport;

(C)

operation and maintenance requirements;

(D)

the review of waste management contracts; and

(E)

the potential for cost savings or the generation of revenue; and

(7)

if the project is at an airport that is listed as having an unclassified status under the most recent national plan of integrated airport systems (as described in section 47103), the project will be funded with an amount appropriated under section 47114(d)(2)(B) and is—

(A)

for maintenance of the pavement of the primary runway;

(B)

for obstruction removal for the primary runway;

(C)

for the rehabilitation of the primary runway; or

(D)

for a project that the Secretary considers necessary for the safe operation of the airport.

(b)Airport Development Project Grant Application Approval.—

The Secretary may approve an application under this subchapter for an airport development project grant for an airport only if the Secretary is satisfied that—

(1)

the sponsor, a public agency, or the Government holds good title to the areas of the airport used or intended to be used for the landing, taking off, or surface maneuvering of aircraft, or that good title will be acquired;

(2)

the interests of the community in or near which the project may be located have been given fair consideration; and

(3)

the application provides touchdown zone and centerline runway lighting, high intensity runway lighting, or land necessary for installing approach light systems that the Secretary, considering the category of the airport and the kind and volume of traffic using it, decides is necessary for safe and efficient use of the airport by aircraft.

(c)Environmental Requirements.—
(1)

The Secretary may approve an application under this subchapter for an airport development project involving the location of an airport or runway or a major runway extension—

(A)

only if the sponsor certifies to the Secretary that—

(i)

an opportunity for a public hearing was given to consider the economic, social, and environmental effects of the location and the location’s consistency with the objectives of any planning that the community has carried out;

(ii)

the airport management board has voting representation from the communities in which the project is located or has advised the communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary about a proposed project; and

(iii)

with respect to an airport development project involving the location of an airport, runway, or major runway extension at a medium or large hub airport, the airport sponsor has made available to and has provided upon request to the metropolitan planning organization in the area in which the airport is located, if any, a copy of the proposed amendment to the airport layout plan to depict the project and a copy of any airport master plan in which the project is described or depicted; and

(B)

if the application is found to have a significant adverse effect on natural resources, including fish and wildlife, natural, scenic, and recreation assets, water and air quality, or another factor affecting the environment, only after finding that no possible and prudent alternative to the project exists and that every reasonable step has been taken to minimize the adverse effect.

(2)

The Secretary may approve an application under this subchapter for an airport development project that does not involve the location of an airport or runway, or a major runway extension, at an existing airport without requiring an environmental impact statement related to noise for the project if—

(A)

completing the project would allow operations at the airport involving aircraft complying with the noise standards prescribed for “stage 3” aircraft in section 36.1 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, to replace existing operations involving aircraft that do not comply with those standards; and

(B)

the project meets the other requirements under this subchapter.

(3)

At the Secretary’s request, the sponsor shall give the Secretary a copy of the transcript of any hearing held under paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection.

(4)

The Secretary may make a finding under paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection only after completely reviewing the matter. The review and finding must be a matter of public record.

(d)Withholding Approval.—
(1)

The Secretary may withhold approval of an application under this subchapter for amounts apportioned under section 47114(c) and (e) of this title for violating an assurance or requirement of this subchapter only if—

(A)

the Secretary provides the sponsor an opportunity for a hearing; and

(B)

not later than 180 days after the later of the date of the application or the date the Secretary discovers the noncompliance, the Secretary finds that a violation has occurred.

(2)

The 180-day period may be extended by—

(A)

agreement between the Secretary and the sponsor; or

(B)

the hearing officer if the officer decides an extension is necessary because the sponsor did not follow the schedule the officer established.

(3)

A person adversely affected by an order of the Secretary withholding approval may obtain review of the order by filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit or in the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which the project is located. The action must be brought not later than 60 days after the order is served on the petitioner.

(e)Reports Relating to Construction of Certain New Hub Airports.—

At least 90 days prior to the approval under this subchapter of a project grant application for construction of a new hub airport that is expected to have 0.25 percent or more of the total annual enplanements in the United States, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report analyzing the anticipated impact of such proposed new airport on—

(1)

the fees charged to air carriers (including landing fees), and other costs that will be incurred by air carriers, for using the proposed airport;

(2)

air transportation that will be provided in the geographic region of the proposed airport; and

(3)

the availability and cost of providing air transportation to rural areas in such geographic region.

(f)Competition Plans.—
(1)Prohibition.—

Beginning in fiscal year 2001, no passenger facility charge may be approved for a covered airport under section 40117 and no grant may be made under this subchapter for a covered airport unless the airport has submitted to the Secretary a written competition plan in accordance with this subsection.

(2)Contents.—

A competition plan under this subsection shall include information on the availability of airport gates and related facilities, leasing and sub-leasing arrangements, gate-use requirements, gate-assignment policy, financial constraints, airport controls over air- and ground-side capacity, and whether the airport intends to build or acquire gates that would be used as common facilities.

(3)Special rule for fiscal year 2002.—

This subsection does not apply to any passenger facility fee approved, or grant made, in fiscal year 2002 if the fee or grant is to be used to improve security at a covered airport.

(4)Covered airport defined.—

In this subsection, the term “covered airport” means a commercial service airport—

(A)

that has more than .25 percent of the total number of passenger boardings each year at all such airports; and

(B)

at which one or two air carriers control more than 50 percent of the passenger boardings.

(g)Consultation With Secretary of Homeland Security.—

The Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Homeland Security before approving an application under this subchapter for an airport development project grant for activities described in section 47102(3)(B)(ii) only as they relate to security equipment or section 47102(3)(B)(x) only as they relate to installation of bulk explosive detection system.

(h)Evaluation of Airport Master Plans.—

When evaluating the master plan of an airport for purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary shall take into account—

(1)

the role the airport plays with respect to medical emergencies and evacuations; and

(2)

the role the airport plays in emergency or disaster preparedness in the community served by the airport.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1254; Pub. L. 103–305, title I, §§ 108, 109, Aug. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 1573; Pub. L. 106–181, title I, § 155(b), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 88; Pub. L. 107–71, title I, § 123(a), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 630; Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, § 426(b), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2187; Pub. L. 108–176, title I, § 187, title III, § 305, Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2518, 2539; Pub. L. 112–95, title I, §§ 111(c)(2)(A)(i), 133, 134, Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 18, 22; Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title I, §§ 148(a), 149, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3214, 3215; Pub. L. 118–63, title VII, § 712(c)(1), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1256.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-272 · 108 Stat. 1254
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-305 · 108 Stat. 1573
  • 2000Amended · Pub. L. 106-181 · 114 Stat. 88
  • 2001Amended · Pub. L. 107-71 · 115 Stat. 630
  • 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-296 · 116 Stat. 2187
  • 2003Amended · Pub. L. 108-176 · 117 Stat. 2518, 2539
  • 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-95 · 126 Stat. 18, 22
  • 2018Amended · Pub. L. 115-254 · 132 Stat. 3214, 3215
  • 2024Amended · Pub. L. 118-63 · 138 Stat. 1256

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-272 on 1994-07-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case